Сам Иммануил Кант был увлеченным своим делом ученым, талантливым преподавателем и эксцентричным, но при этом общительным человеком. emmanuelle_kant. Архив. Фотографии. Blog grant promo. Recommend this entry Has been recommended Send news.
Climate change and the environment take a back seat in Emmanuel Macron's speech on Europe
Emmanuel Kant. 39 лет, Павлодар. Иммануил Кант родился 22 апреля 1724 года в Кенигсберге, Пруссия, в небогатой семье ремесленника. С анимированным портретом 44-летнего Канта кисти Иоганна Готлиба Беккера теперь старается пообщаться почти каждый экскурсант Кафедрального собора. Иммануил Кант с младенчества, просто по праву рождения, был зачислен в гильдию шорников.
Собрались с мыслями. 300 лет Иммануилу Канту. В чем причины русского "антикантианства"? 25.04.2024
Encounters with famous contemporaries? I met with Toynbee twice and told him something about my ideas. But he gave away nothing about himself And I never heard whether the conversation had any effect on him... I got to know Lowell, the famous astronomer, in my younger years - he was my sponsor when I received the doctorate I enjoy meeting people.
Кант умел довести своих студентов до смеха шутками, сохраняя при этом невозмутимый вид.
Постоянное место профессора логики и метафизики Иммануил Кант получил только в 46 лет, а еще он дважды занимал пост ректора Кенигсбергского университета. Свои последние лекции он прочитал летом 1796 года, за несколько лет до своей кончины. Прощание с Кантом было многолюдным Иммануил Кант ушел из жизни 12 февраля 1804 года. Из-за морозной погоды и заледеневшей земли похоронить его смогли лишь через 16 дней.
Все это время жители города приходили к телу философа, чтобы проститься с ним. Среди них были и те, кто не был знаком с его работами. На сами похороны 28 февраля собрались многие высокопоставленные персоны Кенигсберга и окрестных городов. Процессия получилась по-настоящему многолюдной, в ней приняли участие тысячи людей.
Когда она проходила мимо дома Канта, зазвонили все колокола города. Имя философа неотрывно связано с городом, где он провел большую часть жизни. В современном Калининграде есть множество мест, связанных с ним. А в мае 2005 года Балтийскому федеральному университету присвоили имя Иммануила Канта.
Книги по теме.
In his lectures Kant used textbooks by Wolffian authors such as Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten 1714—1762 and Georg Friedrich Meier 1718—1777 , but he followed them loosely and used them to structure his own reflections, which drew on a wide range of ideas of contemporary interest. These ideas often stemmed from British sentimentalist philosophers such as David Hume 1711—1776 and Francis Hutcheson 1694—1747 , some of whose texts were translated into German in the mid-1750s; and from the Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712—1778 , who published a flurry of works in the early 1760s. From early in his career Kant was a popular and successful lecturer. After several years of relative quiet, Kant unleashed another burst of publications in 1762—1764, including five philosophical works. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures 1762 rehearses criticisms of Aristotelian logic that were developed by other German philosophers. The book attracted several positive and some negative reviews.
In Negative Magnitudes Kant also argues that the morality of an action is a function of the internal forces that motivate one to act, rather than of the external physical actions or their consequences. Finally, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime 1764 deals mainly with alleged differences in the tastes of men and women and of people from different cultures. After it was published, Kant filled his own interleaved copy of this book with often unrelated handwritten remarks, many of which reflect the deep influence of Rousseau on his thinking about moral philosophy in the mid-1760s. These works helped to secure Kant a broader reputation in Germany, but for the most part they were not strikingly original. While some of his early works tend to emphasize rationalist ideas, others have a more empiricist emphasis. During this time Kant was striving to work out an independent position, but before the 1770s his views remained fluid. In 1766 Kant published his first work concerned with the possibility of metaphysics, which later became a central topic of his mature philosophy.
In 1770, at the age of forty-six, Kant was appointed to the chair in logic and metaphysics at the Albertina, after teaching for fifteen years as an unsalaried lecturer and working since 1766 as a sublibrarian to supplement his income. Kant was turned down for the same position in 1758. In order to inaugurate his new position, Kant also wrote one more Latin dissertation: Concerning the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World 1770 , which is known as the Inaugural Dissertation. Inspired by Crusius and the Swiss natural philosopher Johann Heinrich Lambert 1728—1777 , Kant distinguishes between two fundamental powers of cognition, sensibility and understanding intelligence , where the Leibniz-Wolffians regarded understanding intellect as the only fundamental power. Moreover, as the title of the Inaugural Dissertation indicates, Kant argues that sensibility and understanding are directed at two different worlds: sensibility gives us access to the sensible world, while understanding enables us to grasp a distinct intelligible world. The Inaugural Dissertation thus develops a form of Platonism; and it rejects the view of British sentimentalists that moral judgments are based on feelings of pleasure or pain, since Kant now holds that moral judgments are based on pure understanding alone. After 1770 Kant never surrendered the views that sensibility and understanding are distinct powers of cognition, that space and time are subjective forms of human sensibility, and that moral judgments are based on pure understanding or reason alone.
But his embrace of Platonism in the Inaugural Dissertation was short-lived. He soon denied that our understanding is capable of insight into an intelligible world, which cleared the path toward his mature position in the Critique of Pure Reason 1781 , according to which the understanding like sensibility supplies forms that structure our experience of the sensible world, to which human knowledge is limited, while the intelligible or noumenal world is strictly unknowable to us. Kant spent a decade working on the Critique of Pure Reason and published nothing else of significance between 1770 and 1781. Kant also published a number of important essays in this period, including Idea for a Universal History With a Cosmopolitan Aim 1784 and Conjectural Beginning of Human History 1786 , his main contributions to the philosophy of history; An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? Jacobi 1743—1819 accused the recently deceased G. Lessing 1729—1781 of Spinozism. With these works Kant secured international fame and came to dominate German philosophy in the late 1780s.
But in 1790 he announced that the Critique of the Power of Judgment brought his critical enterprise to an end 5:170. By then K. In 1794 his chair at Jena passed to J. Kant retired from teaching in 1796. For nearly two decades he had lived a highly disciplined life focused primarily on completing his philosophical system, which began to take definite shape in his mind only in middle age. After retiring he came to believe that there was a gap in this system separating the metaphysical foundations of natural science from physics itself, and he set out to close this gap in a series of notes that postulate the existence of an ether or caloric matter. Kant died February 12, 1804, just short of his eightieth birthday.
See also Bxiv; and 4:255—257. Thus metaphysics for Kant concerns a priori knowledge, or knowledge whose justification does not depend on experience; and he associates a priori knowledge with reason. The project of the Critique is to examine whether, how, and to what extent human reason is capable of a priori knowledge. The Enlightenment was a reaction to the rise and successes of modern science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The spectacular achievements of Newton in particular engendered widespread confidence and optimism about the power of human reason to control nature and to improve human life. One effect of this new confidence in reason was that traditional authorities were increasingly questioned. Why should we need political or religious authorities to tell us how to live or what to believe, if each of us has the capacity to figure these things out for ourselves?
Kant expresses this Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason in the Critique: Our age is the age of criticism, to which everything must submit. Religion through its holiness and legislation through its majesty commonly seek to exempt themselves from it. But in this way they excite a just suspicion against themselves, and cannot lay claim to that unfeigned respect that reason grants only to that which has been able to withstand its free and public examination. Axi Enlightenment is about thinking for oneself rather than letting others think for you, according to What is Enlightenment? In this essay, Kant also expresses the Enlightenment faith in the inevitability of progress. A few independent thinkers will gradually inspire a broader cultural movement, which ultimately will lead to greater freedom of action and governmental reform. The problem is that to some it seemed unclear whether progress would in fact ensue if reason enjoyed full sovereignty over traditional authorities; or whether unaided reasoning would instead lead straight to materialism, fatalism, atheism, skepticism Bxxxiv , or even libertinism and authoritarianism 8:146.
The Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason was tied to the expectation that it would not lead to any of these consequences but instead would support certain key beliefs that tradition had always sanctioned. Crucially, these included belief in God, the soul, freedom, and the compatibility of science with morality and religion. Although a few intellectuals rejected some or all of these beliefs, the general spirit of the Enlightenment was not so radical. The Enlightenment was about replacing traditional authorities with the authority of individual human reason, but it was not about overturning traditional moral and religious beliefs. Yet the original inspiration for the Enlightenment was the new physics, which was mechanistic. If nature is entirely governed by mechanistic, causal laws, then it may seem that there is no room for freedom, a soul, or anything but matter in motion. This threatened the traditional view that morality requires freedom.
We must be free in order to choose what is right over what is wrong, because otherwise we cannot be held responsible. It also threatened the traditional religious belief in a soul that can survive death or be resurrected in an afterlife. So modern science, the pride of the Enlightenment, the source of its optimism about the powers of human reason, threatened to undermine traditional moral and religious beliefs that free rational thought was expected to support. This was the main intellectual crisis of the Enlightenment. In other words, free rational inquiry adequately supports all of these essential human interests and shows them to be mutually consistent. So reason deserves the sovereignty attributed to it by the Enlightenment. The Inaugural Dissertation also tries to reconcile Newtonian science with traditional morality and religion in a way, but its strategy is different from that of the Critique.
According to the Inaugural Dissertation, Newtonian science is true of the sensible world, to which sensibility gives us access; and the understanding grasps principles of divine and moral perfection in a distinct intelligible world, which are paradigms for measuring everything in the sensible world. So on this view our knowledge of the intelligible world is a priori because it does not depend on sensibility, and this a priori knowledge furnishes principles for judging the sensible world because in some way the sensible world itself conforms to or imitates the intelligible world. Soon after writing the Inaugural Dissertation, however, Kant expressed doubts about this view. As he explained in a February 21, 1772 letter to his friend and former student, Marcus Herz: In my dissertation I was content to explain the nature of intellectual representations in a merely negative way, namely, to state that they were not modifications of the soul brought about by the object. However, I silently passed over the further question of how a representation that refers to an object without being in any way affected by it can be possible…. And if such intellectual representations depend on our inner activity, whence comes the agreement that they are supposed to have with objects — objects that are nevertheless not possibly produced thereby? The position of the Inaugural Dissertation is that the intelligible world is independent of the human understanding and of the sensible world, both of which in different ways conform to the intelligible world.
But, leaving aside questions about what it means for the sensible world to conform to an intelligible world, how is it possible for the human understanding to conform to or grasp an intelligible world? If the intelligible world is independent of our understanding, then it seems that we could grasp it only if we are passively affected by it in some way. So the only way we could grasp an intelligible world that is independent of us is through sensibility, which means that our knowledge of it could not be a priori. The pure understanding alone could at best enable us to form representations of an intelligible world. Such a priori intellectual representations could well be figments of the brain that do not correspond to anything independent of the human mind. In any case, it is completely mysterious how there might come to be a correspondence between purely intellectual representations and an independent intelligible world. But the Critique gives a far more modest and yet revolutionary account of a priori knowledge.
This turned out to be a dead end, and Kant never again maintained that we can have a priori knowledge about an intelligible world precisely because such a world would be entirely independent of us. The sensible world, or the world of appearances, is constructed by the human mind from a combination of sensory matter that we receive passively and a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties. We can have a priori knowledge only about aspects of the sensible world that reflect the a priori forms supplied by our cognitive faculties. So according to the Critique, a priori knowledge is possible only if and to the extent that the sensible world itself depends on the way the human mind structures its experience. Kant characterizes this new constructivist view of experience in the Critique through an analogy with the revolution wrought by Copernicus in astronomy: Up to now it has been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects; but all attempts to find out something about them a priori through concepts that would extend our cognition have, on this presupposition, come to nothing. Hence let us once try whether we do not get farther with the problems of metaphysics by assuming that the objects must conform to our cognition, which would agree better with the requested possibility of an a priori cognition of them, which is to establish something about objects before they are given to us. This would be just like the first thoughts of Copernicus, who, when he did not make good progress in the explanation of the celestial motions if he assumed that the entire celestial host revolves around the observer, tried to see if he might not have greater success if he made the observer revolve and left the stars at rest.
Now in metaphysics we can try in a similar way regarding the intuition of objects. If intuition has to conform to the constitution of the objects, then I do not see how we can know anything of them a priori; but if the object as an object of the senses conforms to the constitution of our faculty of intuition, then I can very well represent this possibility to myself. Yet because I cannot stop with these intuitions, if they are to become cognitions, but must refer them as representations to something as their object and determine this object through them, I can assume either that the concepts through which I bring about this determination also conform to the objects, and then I am once again in the same difficulty about how I could know anything about them a priori, or else I assume that the objects, or what is the same thing, the experience in which alone they can be cognized as given objects conforms to those concepts, in which case I immediately see an easier way out of the difficulty, since experience itself is a kind of cognition requiring the understanding, whose rule I have to presuppose in myself before any object is given to me, hence a priori, which rule is expressed in concepts a priori, to which all objects of experience must therefore necessarily conform, and with which they must agree. Bxvi—xviii As this passage suggests, what Kant has changed in the Critique is primarily his view about the role and powers of the understanding, since he already held in the Inaugural Dissertation that sensibility contributes the forms of space and time — which he calls pure or a priori intuitions 2:397 — to our cognition of the sensible world. But the Critique claims that pure understanding too, rather than giving us insight into an intelligible world, is limited to providing forms — which he calls pure or a priori concepts — that structure our cognition of the sensible world. So now both sensibility and understanding work together to construct cognition of the sensible world, which therefore conforms to the a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties: the a priori intuitions of sensibility and the a priori concepts of the understanding. This account is analogous to the heliocentric revolution of Copernicus in astronomy because both require contributions from the observer to be factored into explanations of phenomena, although neither reduces phenomena to the contributions of observers alone.
For Kant, analogously, the phenomena of human experience depend on both the sensory data that we receive passively through sensibility and the way our mind actively processes this data according to its own a priori rules. These rules supply the general framework in which the sensible world and all the objects or phenomena in it appear to us. So the sensible world and its phenomena are not entirely independent of the human mind, which contributes its basic structure. First, it gives Kant a new and ingenious way of placing modern science on an a priori foundation. In other words, the sensible world necessarily conforms to certain fundamental laws — such as that every event has a cause — because the human mind constructs it according to those laws. Moreover, we can identify those laws by reflecting on the conditions of possible experience, which reveals that it would be impossible for us to experience a world in which, for example, any given event fails to have a cause.
Теперь он имеет право преподавать в университете и незамедлительно воспользовался этой возможностью. Он учил студентов логике и метафизике. Самой интересной работой первого периода философской деятельности Канта ученые назвали «Всеобщую естественную историю и теорию неба». В ней изложена история происхождения Вселенной, причем с точки зрения физики, а не теологии. В том же периоде Кант занялся изучением теории пространства с точки зрения физики. Он верил в то, что Высший Разум существует, и именно он положил начало жизни на Земле. Иммануил говорил, что существование материи доказывает существование Бога. Он считал, что за материальными вещами обязательно стоит их Создатель. Именно эта мысль отражена в его труде под названием «Единственно возможное основание для доказательства бытия Бога». Начало критического периода философского творчества Канта пришлось на годы преподавания логики и метафизики в вузе. Гипотезы ученого менялись постепенно. Вначале он пересмотрел свое отношение к пространству и времени. Этот период биографы Канта назвали критицизмом. В эти годы он пристально изучал этику, эстетику, гносеологию, написал самые выдающиеся свои работы, которые легли в основу мирового учения. В 1781-м научная биография философа расширилась самой фундаментальной работой под названием «Критика чистого разума», где он разъясняет, что такое категорический императив. Личная жизнь Кант был далеко не красавцем, невысокий, с впалой грудью и узкими плечами. Несмотря на это, он всегда выглядел опрятным и ухоженным, ежемесячно ходил к парикмахеру и портному. Иммануил предпочитал затворничество, он так и не создал семью, потому что свято верил, что личная жизнь станет помехой занятиям наукой. Именно эта уверенность не дала ему повести под венец одну из красавиц, которые постоянно его окружали. Он любил красивых женщин и не переставал ими восхищаться. В преклонном возрасте он перестал видеть левым глазом, поэтому всегда усаживал одну из юных красавиц с правой стороны. Философ никому никогда не признавался в своих чувствах. Одна из женщин из его окружения — Луиза Ребекка Фриц, впоследствии вспоминала, что вызывала симпатию ученого. По мнению Боровского Кант влюблялся два раза, и даже собирался жениться на своих возлюбленных. Иммануил отличался редким педантизмом, он придерживался распорядка вплоть до минуты, ни разу в жизни не опоздал. Ежедневно, в одно и то же время он приходил в кафе и выпивал там чашку чая. Официанты этого заведения могли сверять по нему часы. С таким же педантизмом он отправлялся везде, даже на обычные прогулки. С детских лет Кант не отличался богатырским здоровьем, он разработал для себя специальную гигиену, которая и помогла ему достичь преклонного возраста. Его день начинался в пять часов утра.
Ведущие ученые мира выступили с докладами на Международном Кантовском конгрессе
His cosmopolitan reputation is called into question by his promulgation of scientific racism for much of his career, although he altered his views on the subject in the last decade of his life. It was said that neighbors would set their clocks by his daily walks. He never married but seems to have had a rewarding social life; he was a popular teacher as well as a modestly successful author, even before starting on his major philosophical works. He first attended the Collegium Fridericianum , from which he graduated at the end of the summer of 1740. Knutzen dissuaded Kant from the theory of pre-established harmony , which he regarded as "the pillow for the lazy mind".
The theory of transcendental idealism that Kant later included in the Critique of Pure Reason was developed partially in opposition to traditional idealism. Kant had contacts with students, colleagues, friends and diners who frequented the local Masonic lodge. In 1749, he published his first philosophical work, Thoughts on the True Estimation of Living Forces written in 1745—1747. In his 1756 essay on the theory of winds, Kant laid out an original insight into the Coriolis force.
In 1756, Kant also published three papers on the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. In 1757, Kant began lecturing on geography making him one of the first lecturers to explicitly teach geography as its own subject. After Kant became a professor in 1770, he expanded the topics of his lectures to include lectures on natural law, ethics, and anthropology, along with other topics. Kant also correctly deduced that the Milky Way was a large disk of stars , which he theorized formed from a much larger spinning gas cloud.
He further suggested that other distant "nebulae" might be other galaxies. These postulations opened new horizons for astronomy, for the first time extending it beyond the solar system to galactic and intergalactic realms. In the early 1760s, Kant produced a series of important works in philosophy. In defense of this appointment, Kant wrote his inaugural dissertation On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [c] This work saw the emergence of several central themes of his mature work, including the distinction between the faculties of intellectual thought and sensible receptivity.
To miss this distinction would mean to commit the error of subreption , and, as he says in the last chapter of the dissertation, only in avoiding this error does metaphysics flourish. While it is true that Kant wrote his greatest works relatively late in life, there is a tendency to underestimate the value of his earlier works. Recent Kant scholarship has devoted more attention to these "pre-critical" writings and has recognized a degree of continuity with his mature work. In correspondence with his ex-student and friend Markus Herz , Kant admitted that, in the inaugural dissertation, he had failed to account for the relation between our sensible and intellectual faculties.
Kant also credited David Hume with awakening him from a "dogmatic slumber" in which he had unquestioningly accepted the tenets of both religion and natural philosophy. Ideas such as causality , morality , and objects are not evident in experience, so their reality may be questioned. Kant felt that reason could remove this skepticism, and he set himself to solving these problems. Kant was quite upset with its reception.
Recognizing the need to clarify the original treatise, Kant wrote the Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics in 1783 as a summary of its main views. In 1786, Karl Leonhard Reinhold published a series of public letters on Kantian philosophy. Friedrich Jacobi had accused the recently deceased Gotthold Ephraim Lessing a distinguished dramatist and philosophical essayist of Spinozism. The controversy gradually escalated into a debate about the values of the Enlightenment and the value of reason.
Most of his subsequent work focused on other areas of philosophy. The 1790 Critique of the Power of Judgment the third Critique applied the Kantian system to aesthetics and teleology. There were several journals devoted solely to defending and criticizing Kantian philosophy.
Сообщается, что финансовые условия будут аналогичными тем, которые есть у Канте в «Челси» на данный момент. Материалы по теме.
Some commentators consider this the most significant section of the Critique. He argues that the unity of time implies that "all change must consist in the alteration of states in an underlying substance, whose existence and quantity must be unchangeable or conserved. That was the end of the chapter in the A edition of the Critique. The B edition includes one more short section, "The Refutation of Idealism". In this section, by analysis of the concept of self-consciousness, Kant argues that his transcendental idealism is a "critical" or "formal" idealism that does not deny the existence of reality apart from our subjective representations. Against this, Kant reasserts his own insistence upon the necessity of a sensible component in all genuine knowledge. In particular, it is concerned to demonstrate as spurious the efforts of reason to arrive at knowledge independent of sensibility. This endeavor, Kant argues, is doomed to failure, which he claims to demonstrate by showing that reason, unbounded by sense, is always capable of generating opposing or otherwise incompatible conclusions. Like "the light dove, in free flight cutting through the air, the resistance of which it feels", reason "could get the idea that it could do even better in airless space". He presents the speculative excesses of traditional metaphysics as inherent in our very capacity of reason. Moreover, he argues that its products are not without some carefully qualified regulative value. They are different from the concepts of understanding in that they are not limited by the critical stricture limiting knowledge to the conditions of possible experience and its objects. Kant replaces the first with the positive results of the first part of the Critique. He proposes to replace the following three with his later doctrines of anthropology, the metaphysical foundations of natural science, and the critical postulation of human freedom and morality. He does this by developing contradictions in each of the three metaphysical disciplines that he contends are in fact pseudosciences. In this context, it not possible to do much more than enumerate the topics of discussion. The first chapter addresses what Kant terms the paralogisms—i. He argues that one cannot take the mere thought of "I" in the proposition "I think" as the proper cognition of "I" as an object. In this way, he claims to debunk various metaphysical theses about the substantiality, unity, and self-identity of the soul. Originally, Kant had thought that all transcendental illusion could be analyzed in antinomic terms. Whereas an idea is a pure concept generated by reason, an ideal is the concept of an idea as an individual thing. In an Appendix to this section, Kant rejects such a conclusion. The ideas of pure reason, he argues, have an important regulatory function in directing and organizing our theoretical and practical inquiry. With regard to morality , Kant argued that the source of the good lies not in anything outside the human subject, either in nature or given by God , but rather is only the good will itself. A good will is one that acts from duty in accordance with the universal moral law that the autonomous human being freely gives itself. This law obliges one to treat humanity—understood as rational agency, and represented through oneself as well as others—as an end in itself rather than merely as means to other ends the individual might hold. Kant is known for his theory that all moral obligation is grounded in what he calls the " categorical imperative ", which is derived from the concept of duty. He argues that the moral law is a principle of reason itself, not based on contingent facts about the world, such as what would make us happy; to act on the moral law has no other motive than "worthiness to be happy". Kant finds it a source of difficulty that the practical idea of freedom is founded on the transcendental idea of freedom, [132] but for the sake of practical interests uses the practical meaning, taking "no account of... Reason can give us only the "pragmatic laws of free action through the senses", but pure practical laws given by reason a priori dictate "what is to be done". For Kant, although actions as theoretical objects are constituted by means of the theoretical categories, actions as practical objects objects of practical use of reason, and which can be good or bad are constituted by means of the categories of freedom. Only in this way can actions, as phenomena, be a consequence of freedom, and be understood and evaluated as such.
Для того времени это была настолько радикальная идея, что многие называли её абсурдной. Но Кант считал, что единственный способ предотвратить войны и угнетение — это международное правительство, объединяющее государства. Несколько веков спустя на основе этого была создана Организация Объединённых Наций. Саморазвитие Большинство философов Просвещения считали, что лучший способ жить — как можно больше увеличивать счастье и сокращать страдания. Такой подход называется утилитаризмом. Это и сегодня самый распространённый взгляд. Кант смотрел на жизнь совершенно по-другому. Он считал так: если хочешь сделать мир лучше, начни с себя. Вот как он это объяснял. В большинстве случаев невозможно узнать, заслуживает человек счастья или страдания, потому что невозможно узнать его настоящие намерения и цели. Даже если стоит сделать кого-то счастливым, неизвестно, что именно для этого нужно. Вы не знаете чувств, ценностей и ожиданий другого человека. Не знаете, как ваш поступок на нём скажется. К тому же неясно, из чего именно состоит счастье или страдание. Сегодня развод может причинять вам невыносимую боль, а через год вы будете считать это лучшим, что с вами происходило. Поэтому единственный логичный способ сделать мир лучше — это стать лучше самому. Ведь единственное, что вы знаете хоть сколько-то точно, — это вы сами. Кант определял саморазвитие как способность придерживаться категорических императивов. Он считал это долгом каждого. С его точки зрения, награда или наказание за невыполнение долга даётся не в раю или аду, а в той жизни, которую каждый создаёт для себя. Следование моральным принципам делает жизнь лучше не только для вас, но и для всех вокруг. Точно так же нарушение этих принципов создаёт лишние страдания для вас и окружающих. Правило Канта запускает эффект домино. Став честнее с собой, вы станете честнее и с другими. Это, в свою очередь, вдохновит людей быть честнее с собой и внесёт позитивные изменения в их жизнь. Если бы правила Канта придерживалось достаточное количество людей, мир изменился бы к лучшему. Причём сильнее, чем от целенаправленных действий какой-то организации. Самоуважение Уважение к себе и уважение к окружающим взаимосвязаны. Обращение с собственной психикой — это шаблон, который мы применяем для взаимодействия с другими людьми. Вы не добьётесь больших успехов с другими, пока не разберётесь с собой. Самоуважение не в том, чтобы лучше себя чувствовать. Это понимание своей ценности. Понимание, что каждый человек, кем бы он ни был, заслуживает базовых прав и уважения. С точки зрения Канта, говорить себе, что ты ничего не стоящий кусок дерьма, так же неэтично, как говорить это другому человеку. Причинять вред себе так же отвратительно, как причинять вред окружающим. Поэтому любовь к себе и забота о себе — это не то, чему можно научиться, и не то, что можно практиковать, как говорят сегодня. Это то, что вы призваны культивировать в себе с точки зрения этики. Как это повлияло на меня и как может повлиять на вас Философия Канта, если глубоко в неё погрузиться, полна противоречий. Но его первоначальные идеи настолько сильны, что, несомненно, изменили мир. И изменили меня, когда я наткнулся на них год назад. Большую часть времени в промежутке от 20 до 30 лет я потратил на некоторые пункты из вышеперечисленного списка. Мне казалось, они сделают мою жизнь лучше. Но чем больше я к этому стремился, тем опустошённее себя чувствовал. Чтение Канта стало озарением. Он открыл для меня удивительную вещь. Не так важно, что именно мы делаем, важна цель этих действий. Пока вы не нашли правильную цель, вы не найдёте ничего стоящего. Кант не всегда был помешанным на распорядке занудой. В молодости он тоже любил повеселиться. Он засиживался допоздна с друзьями за вином и картами.
Climate change and the environment take a back seat in Emmanuel Macron's speech on Europe
Settings and more. Buffering. Emmanuelle Kant (Original Mix) (our 2nd recordeal!) BESTINSPACE ™. Читайте последние новости на тему в ленте новостей на сайте РИА Новости. Адмиралы Балтийского флота уверены, что Канта звали Эммануэль. Эммануэль Кант.#кант #балтфлот
Последние дни Иммануила Канта (1994) Les derniers jours d Emmanuel Kant
По состоянию на 21. Праздник народного волеизъявления продолжится до 30 ноября 2018 года. Как голосуют за Канта В голосовании по проекту «Великие имена России» калининградцы проявляют большую, чем в среднем активность при сравнении с другими регионами страны. Проголосовать за одно из предложенных имён для аэропорта Храброво можно здесь.
Moreover, the Russian Federation now has plenty of German trophies. Recently, a slightly damaged Leopard 2A5 tank was removed from the battlefield. It is strange that Mr. Scholz has not yet prohibited the Russian military from dismantling it.
How is a perception of beauty possible?
How are living creatures possible? These questions are transcending because their point is not to get an understanding of one definite being from other being; rather, it is an understanding of existence itself that each question seeks at the boundary of existence, from principles that do not belong to existence as objects of cognition.
Пока задать вопрос можно только на интересные ему темы. Но разработчики обещают расширить «кругозор» мыслителя.
С анимированным портретом 44-летнего Канта кисти Иоганна Готлиба Беккера теперь старается пообщаться почти каждый экскурсант Кафедрального собора. В беседе с вируальным Кантом надо соблюдать определенный этикет, точнее правила работы с системой. Во-первых , он не терпит фамильярности. В отличие от заполонивших современные гаджеты голосовых ассистенток, никакие «Ок», «Привет» или «Слушай» не привлекут внимание профессора.
Spotify is currently not available in your country.
| Immanuel Kant and Nazism | | Иммануил Кант — на странице писателя вы найдёте биографию, список книг и экранизаций, интересные факты из жизни, рецензии читателей и цитаты из книг. |
| Новая экспозиция, первая книга, премьера лекции и стендап | Emmanuel Kant (@kant_authentic) sur TikTok |66.4K j'aime.23.8K e la dernière vidéo de Emmanuel Kant (@kant_authentic). |
| Не в себе — LiveJournal | Последние дни Иммануила Канта: Directed by Philippe Collin. |
| Immanuel Kant | Иммануи́л Кант — немецкий философ, один из центральных мыслителей эпохи Просвещения. Всесторонние и систематические работы Канта в области эпистемологии, метафизики. |
| Ипохондрик, гений и городская звезда: 5 фактов об Иммануиле Канте | Онлайн-журнал Эксмо | Though Kant is as undeniably German as the Nord Stream pipeline, Putin (and anyone else anywhere) has a right to quote him morning, noon and. |
Канте купил клуб в Бельгии после подписания контракта «Аль-Иттихадом»
Специальная сессия «Наследие Иммануила Канта для современных международных отношений» в Калининграде 231 23 апреля 2024 г. Канта при участии Института Европы РАН — провели специальную научно-экспертную сессию «Наследие Иммануила Канта для современных международных отношений». В ходе мероприятия участники рассмотрели широкий спектр проблем теории и практики современных международных отношений и безопасности через призму политической и международно-правовой мысли выдающегося философа. В центре внимания не только наиболее острые проблемы развития современного политического миропорядка, глобальной и региональной безопасности, но и обстановка в Балтийско-Арктическом регионе, а также вопросы мирового социально-экономического и политического развития.
Конечно, реальные заслуги Канта намного шире.
В частности, именно он первым среди классических немецких философов осмыслил необходимость существования университетов, а также как никто метко дал характеристику своей эпохе. Просвещение он характеризовал как выход человека из состояния своего несовершеннолетия, то есть из невозможности пользоваться разумом без помощи кого-то другого. Это был в высшей степени оригинальный мыслитель, которого ставят в один ряд по значению для с Платоном, Коперником или Ньютоном. Немалая его заслуга и в развитии педагогики, в своих работах он вывел собственные идеалы, цели и задачи этой науки, не потерявшие своей актуальности и по сей день.
Научные заслуги Канта признавали и его почитатели, и его противники. Наверное, потому и задержалось его продвижение по карьерной лестнице, что было у него много завистников. Лишь в 1770 году он наконец стал профессором. Сам Кант никогда не церемонился со своими критиками, как среди коллег-учёных, обзывая их неспособными понять его лентяями, а их претензии — существующими только в их головах; так и среди власть предержащих и духовенства, которым не нравился излишний материализм учёного.
Было немало людей, считавших его сумасбродом. Но всем приходилось мириться с масштабом личности учёного, который уже при жизни стал иконой для молодых философов во многих странах. На рубеже XIX века здоровье уже немолодого учёного пошатнулось. К тому времени он уже дважды избирался ректором Кёнигсбергского университета — в 1786 году и в 1788 году.
Учёный реагировал на всё более прогрессирующие болезни в своём духе, жалуясь, что не знает, зачем и как ему жить, если он больше ничего не может принести в этот мир. Но, даже находясь при смерти, из-за деменции мало что соображая, он преображался на глазах, когда с ним пытались заговорить на научные темы, пытаясь вести диспуты с приходившими его навестить коллегами и учениками. Философ тихо отошёл в мир иной 12 февраля 1804 года. На похороны учёного пришли тысячи людей, одних только студентов были сотни — столь велик был авторитет Канта.
Похоронили его у северной стены Кафедрального собора Кёнигсберга. Несмотря на все перипетии истории, в том числе разрушительные бои за Кёнигсберг 1945 года, могила сохранилась до наших дней, и является одним из мест паломничества в современном Калининграде. Кант в советской и российской науке Хотя сочинения Канта проникли в Россию ещё при жизни автора, достаточно долгое время массово они не издавались на русском языке. А в первые десятилетия Советской власти к нему стало иметь место довольно настороженное отношение, как и вообще ко всем классикам немецкой философии.
Особенно это ярко проявилось в годы Великой Отечественной войны. Кроме того, в публикациях тех лет припоминались некоторые его высказывания, которые можно при определённом подходе расценить как предтечу германского милитаризма и нацизма. Но всё это было налётом времени — даже тогда не отрицалось, что из кантианства черпали и Гегель, и Маркс, и Энгельс, и другие классики философии. В 1960-е годы на русском языке впервые было издано собрание сочинений великого философа в шести томах.
В предисловии издатели отмечали, что труды Канта- одни из теоретических источников марксизма, без изучения которых невозможно понять диалектику, а также полноценно критиковать «современную буржуазную философию». Выпущенные в дальнейшем не вошедшие в собрание малоизвестные работы, а также записи лекций, письма и прочие материалы в целом довершили дело издания на русском языке всего наследия философа. Приблизительно в те же годы в значительной степени был возбуждён интерес исследователей к научному наследию Канта. В рамках дисциплины «Немецкая классическая философия» значение его как учёного и мыслителя признавалось, бесспорно, но он рассматривался как хоть и первый, но всё же в общем ряду немецких философов: Кант-Гегель-Маркс.
Упор делался на материализм и диалектику Канта, но в советское время всё же они затенялись величиной Гегеля — в современной же философии гораздо большее внимание уделяется как раз Канту. Наиболее крупные исследования Канта появились в середине 1980-х годов.
По состоянию на 21.
Праздник народного волеизъявления продолжится до 30 ноября 2018 года. Как голосуют за Канта В голосовании по проекту «Великие имена России» калининградцы проявляют большую, чем в среднем активность при сравнении с другими регионами страны. Проголосовать за одно из предложенных имён для аэропорта Храброво можно здесь.
Во-вторых , не стоит задавать ему вопросы, пока внизу горит красная полоса-бегунок — кант в это время размышляет, копаясь в своем выдающемся искусственном интеллекте. Алексей Быков, руководитель цифрового экспоната «Беседа с Кантом»: «Встречаемся с разными сложностями из-за того, что искусственный интеллект работает с библиотеками распознавания речи с открытым кодом. Иногда бывают у нас сбои из-за этого. Мы его постоянно дорабатываем». Что точно не нуждается в доработке уже сейчас — это фразы, которые использует цифровой Иммануил Кант во время беседы. Ольга Юрицына, заведующая секцией «Музей Иммануила Канта» в Кафедральном соборе Калининграда: «Отбирая цитаты, мы могли отобрать намного больше, чем 250.
‘Nothing would survive’ Scientists warn dark energy could ‘END universe at any moment’
Сам Иммануил Кант был увлеченным своим делом ученым, талантливым преподавателем и эксцентричным, но при этом общительным человеком. The Life, Work and Legacy of Carl Jung. Category: Emmanuel Kant. Kant observed that men formed states to constrain their passions, but that each state sought to preserve its absolute freedom, even at the cost of “a lawless state of savagery.”. На этой странице собраны самые актуальные новости университета БФУ им Канта.
Emmanuel Kant
3 monthly listeners. Иммануил Кант – немецкий философ, основал немецкую классическую философию, жил в эпоху Просвещения и романтизма. Новости компаний.
Последние дни Иммануила Канта (1996)
If the second hypothesis is correct and dark energy is really a quintessence, then the future may hold a lot of amazing and unpleasant surprises. Story Saved You can find this story in My Bookmarks. Or by navigating to the user icon in the top right.
These ideas often stemmed from British sentimentalist philosophers such as David Hume 1711—1776 and Francis Hutcheson 1694—1747 , some of whose texts were translated into German in the mid-1750s; and from the Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712—1778 , who published a flurry of works in the early 1760s. From early in his career Kant was a popular and successful lecturer. After several years of relative quiet, Kant unleashed another burst of publications in 1762—1764, including five philosophical works. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures 1762 rehearses criticisms of Aristotelian logic that were developed by other German philosophers.
The book attracted several positive and some negative reviews. In Negative Magnitudes Kant also argues that the morality of an action is a function of the internal forces that motivate one to act, rather than of the external physical actions or their consequences. Finally, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime 1764 deals mainly with alleged differences in the tastes of men and women and of people from different cultures. After it was published, Kant filled his own interleaved copy of this book with often unrelated handwritten remarks, many of which reflect the deep influence of Rousseau on his thinking about moral philosophy in the mid-1760s. These works helped to secure Kant a broader reputation in Germany, but for the most part they were not strikingly original. While some of his early works tend to emphasize rationalist ideas, others have a more empiricist emphasis.
During this time Kant was striving to work out an independent position, but before the 1770s his views remained fluid. In 1766 Kant published his first work concerned with the possibility of metaphysics, which later became a central topic of his mature philosophy. In 1770, at the age of forty-six, Kant was appointed to the chair in logic and metaphysics at the Albertina, after teaching for fifteen years as an unsalaried lecturer and working since 1766 as a sublibrarian to supplement his income. Kant was turned down for the same position in 1758. In order to inaugurate his new position, Kant also wrote one more Latin dissertation: Concerning the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World 1770 , which is known as the Inaugural Dissertation. Inspired by Crusius and the Swiss natural philosopher Johann Heinrich Lambert 1728—1777 , Kant distinguishes between two fundamental powers of cognition, sensibility and understanding intelligence , where the Leibniz-Wolffians regarded understanding intellect as the only fundamental power.
Moreover, as the title of the Inaugural Dissertation indicates, Kant argues that sensibility and understanding are directed at two different worlds: sensibility gives us access to the sensible world, while understanding enables us to grasp a distinct intelligible world. The Inaugural Dissertation thus develops a form of Platonism; and it rejects the view of British sentimentalists that moral judgments are based on feelings of pleasure or pain, since Kant now holds that moral judgments are based on pure understanding alone. After 1770 Kant never surrendered the views that sensibility and understanding are distinct powers of cognition, that space and time are subjective forms of human sensibility, and that moral judgments are based on pure understanding or reason alone. But his embrace of Platonism in the Inaugural Dissertation was short-lived. He soon denied that our understanding is capable of insight into an intelligible world, which cleared the path toward his mature position in the Critique of Pure Reason 1781 , according to which the understanding like sensibility supplies forms that structure our experience of the sensible world, to which human knowledge is limited, while the intelligible or noumenal world is strictly unknowable to us. Kant spent a decade working on the Critique of Pure Reason and published nothing else of significance between 1770 and 1781.
Kant also published a number of important essays in this period, including Idea for a Universal History With a Cosmopolitan Aim 1784 and Conjectural Beginning of Human History 1786 , his main contributions to the philosophy of history; An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? Jacobi 1743—1819 accused the recently deceased G. Lessing 1729—1781 of Spinozism. With these works Kant secured international fame and came to dominate German philosophy in the late 1780s. But in 1790 he announced that the Critique of the Power of Judgment brought his critical enterprise to an end 5:170. By then K.
In 1794 his chair at Jena passed to J. Kant retired from teaching in 1796. For nearly two decades he had lived a highly disciplined life focused primarily on completing his philosophical system, which began to take definite shape in his mind only in middle age. After retiring he came to believe that there was a gap in this system separating the metaphysical foundations of natural science from physics itself, and he set out to close this gap in a series of notes that postulate the existence of an ether or caloric matter. Kant died February 12, 1804, just short of his eightieth birthday. See also Bxiv; and 4:255—257.
Thus metaphysics for Kant concerns a priori knowledge, or knowledge whose justification does not depend on experience; and he associates a priori knowledge with reason. The project of the Critique is to examine whether, how, and to what extent human reason is capable of a priori knowledge. The Enlightenment was a reaction to the rise and successes of modern science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The spectacular achievements of Newton in particular engendered widespread confidence and optimism about the power of human reason to control nature and to improve human life. One effect of this new confidence in reason was that traditional authorities were increasingly questioned. Why should we need political or religious authorities to tell us how to live or what to believe, if each of us has the capacity to figure these things out for ourselves?
Kant expresses this Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason in the Critique: Our age is the age of criticism, to which everything must submit. Religion through its holiness and legislation through its majesty commonly seek to exempt themselves from it. But in this way they excite a just suspicion against themselves, and cannot lay claim to that unfeigned respect that reason grants only to that which has been able to withstand its free and public examination. Axi Enlightenment is about thinking for oneself rather than letting others think for you, according to What is Enlightenment? In this essay, Kant also expresses the Enlightenment faith in the inevitability of progress. A few independent thinkers will gradually inspire a broader cultural movement, which ultimately will lead to greater freedom of action and governmental reform.
The problem is that to some it seemed unclear whether progress would in fact ensue if reason enjoyed full sovereignty over traditional authorities; or whether unaided reasoning would instead lead straight to materialism, fatalism, atheism, skepticism Bxxxiv , or even libertinism and authoritarianism 8:146. The Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason was tied to the expectation that it would not lead to any of these consequences but instead would support certain key beliefs that tradition had always sanctioned. Crucially, these included belief in God, the soul, freedom, and the compatibility of science with morality and religion. Although a few intellectuals rejected some or all of these beliefs, the general spirit of the Enlightenment was not so radical. The Enlightenment was about replacing traditional authorities with the authority of individual human reason, but it was not about overturning traditional moral and religious beliefs. Yet the original inspiration for the Enlightenment was the new physics, which was mechanistic.
If nature is entirely governed by mechanistic, causal laws, then it may seem that there is no room for freedom, a soul, or anything but matter in motion. This threatened the traditional view that morality requires freedom. We must be free in order to choose what is right over what is wrong, because otherwise we cannot be held responsible. It also threatened the traditional religious belief in a soul that can survive death or be resurrected in an afterlife. So modern science, the pride of the Enlightenment, the source of its optimism about the powers of human reason, threatened to undermine traditional moral and religious beliefs that free rational thought was expected to support. This was the main intellectual crisis of the Enlightenment.
In other words, free rational inquiry adequately supports all of these essential human interests and shows them to be mutually consistent. So reason deserves the sovereignty attributed to it by the Enlightenment. The Inaugural Dissertation also tries to reconcile Newtonian science with traditional morality and religion in a way, but its strategy is different from that of the Critique. According to the Inaugural Dissertation, Newtonian science is true of the sensible world, to which sensibility gives us access; and the understanding grasps principles of divine and moral perfection in a distinct intelligible world, which are paradigms for measuring everything in the sensible world. So on this view our knowledge of the intelligible world is a priori because it does not depend on sensibility, and this a priori knowledge furnishes principles for judging the sensible world because in some way the sensible world itself conforms to or imitates the intelligible world. Soon after writing the Inaugural Dissertation, however, Kant expressed doubts about this view.
As he explained in a February 21, 1772 letter to his friend and former student, Marcus Herz: In my dissertation I was content to explain the nature of intellectual representations in a merely negative way, namely, to state that they were not modifications of the soul brought about by the object. However, I silently passed over the further question of how a representation that refers to an object without being in any way affected by it can be possible…. And if such intellectual representations depend on our inner activity, whence comes the agreement that they are supposed to have with objects — objects that are nevertheless not possibly produced thereby? The position of the Inaugural Dissertation is that the intelligible world is independent of the human understanding and of the sensible world, both of which in different ways conform to the intelligible world. But, leaving aside questions about what it means for the sensible world to conform to an intelligible world, how is it possible for the human understanding to conform to or grasp an intelligible world? If the intelligible world is independent of our understanding, then it seems that we could grasp it only if we are passively affected by it in some way.
So the only way we could grasp an intelligible world that is independent of us is through sensibility, which means that our knowledge of it could not be a priori. The pure understanding alone could at best enable us to form representations of an intelligible world. Such a priori intellectual representations could well be figments of the brain that do not correspond to anything independent of the human mind. In any case, it is completely mysterious how there might come to be a correspondence between purely intellectual representations and an independent intelligible world. But the Critique gives a far more modest and yet revolutionary account of a priori knowledge. This turned out to be a dead end, and Kant never again maintained that we can have a priori knowledge about an intelligible world precisely because such a world would be entirely independent of us.
The sensible world, or the world of appearances, is constructed by the human mind from a combination of sensory matter that we receive passively and a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties. We can have a priori knowledge only about aspects of the sensible world that reflect the a priori forms supplied by our cognitive faculties. So according to the Critique, a priori knowledge is possible only if and to the extent that the sensible world itself depends on the way the human mind structures its experience. Kant characterizes this new constructivist view of experience in the Critique through an analogy with the revolution wrought by Copernicus in astronomy: Up to now it has been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects; but all attempts to find out something about them a priori through concepts that would extend our cognition have, on this presupposition, come to nothing. Hence let us once try whether we do not get farther with the problems of metaphysics by assuming that the objects must conform to our cognition, which would agree better with the requested possibility of an a priori cognition of them, which is to establish something about objects before they are given to us. This would be just like the first thoughts of Copernicus, who, when he did not make good progress in the explanation of the celestial motions if he assumed that the entire celestial host revolves around the observer, tried to see if he might not have greater success if he made the observer revolve and left the stars at rest.
Now in metaphysics we can try in a similar way regarding the intuition of objects. If intuition has to conform to the constitution of the objects, then I do not see how we can know anything of them a priori; but if the object as an object of the senses conforms to the constitution of our faculty of intuition, then I can very well represent this possibility to myself. Yet because I cannot stop with these intuitions, if they are to become cognitions, but must refer them as representations to something as their object and determine this object through them, I can assume either that the concepts through which I bring about this determination also conform to the objects, and then I am once again in the same difficulty about how I could know anything about them a priori, or else I assume that the objects, or what is the same thing, the experience in which alone they can be cognized as given objects conforms to those concepts, in which case I immediately see an easier way out of the difficulty, since experience itself is a kind of cognition requiring the understanding, whose rule I have to presuppose in myself before any object is given to me, hence a priori, which rule is expressed in concepts a priori, to which all objects of experience must therefore necessarily conform, and with which they must agree. Bxvi—xviii As this passage suggests, what Kant has changed in the Critique is primarily his view about the role and powers of the understanding, since he already held in the Inaugural Dissertation that sensibility contributes the forms of space and time — which he calls pure or a priori intuitions 2:397 — to our cognition of the sensible world. But the Critique claims that pure understanding too, rather than giving us insight into an intelligible world, is limited to providing forms — which he calls pure or a priori concepts — that structure our cognition of the sensible world. So now both sensibility and understanding work together to construct cognition of the sensible world, which therefore conforms to the a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties: the a priori intuitions of sensibility and the a priori concepts of the understanding.
This account is analogous to the heliocentric revolution of Copernicus in astronomy because both require contributions from the observer to be factored into explanations of phenomena, although neither reduces phenomena to the contributions of observers alone. For Kant, analogously, the phenomena of human experience depend on both the sensory data that we receive passively through sensibility and the way our mind actively processes this data according to its own a priori rules. These rules supply the general framework in which the sensible world and all the objects or phenomena in it appear to us. So the sensible world and its phenomena are not entirely independent of the human mind, which contributes its basic structure. First, it gives Kant a new and ingenious way of placing modern science on an a priori foundation. In other words, the sensible world necessarily conforms to certain fundamental laws — such as that every event has a cause — because the human mind constructs it according to those laws.
Moreover, we can identify those laws by reflecting on the conditions of possible experience, which reveals that it would be impossible for us to experience a world in which, for example, any given event fails to have a cause. From this Kant concludes that metaphysics is indeed possible in the sense that we can have a priori knowledge that the entire sensible world — not just our actual experience, but any possible human experience — necessarily conforms to certain laws.
Так, например, профессор кафедры истории зарубежной философии МГУ им. Ломоносова Валерий Семенов выступил с докладом "Сознание и мышление как основа Кантовской трансцендентальной философии". Профессор Самаркандского университета Алексей Крюков и приват-доцент Геттингенского университета, профессор Самаркандского университета Гутшмидт Хольгер подискутировали на тему познания опыта и разграничения понятий "явление" и "феномен". С одной стороны, попытаться найти оригинального Канта - это задача фактически каждого поколения.
С другой стороны, попытаться связать и по-хорошему использовать учение Канта для решения заново или впервые возникающих проблем - это задача каждого нового поколения. Тема исследования Канта не будет исчерпана еще следующие лет триста, - отметила научный директор Академии Кантианы БФУ им. Канта" Актуальность работ Канта можно было проследить и по многочисленным вопросам, которые докладчикам на сессиях задавали прямо из зала. Так, например, врио директора Института философии РАН Абдусаламу Гусейнову пришлось объяснять, чем практическая философия по Канту отличается от моральной.
Он был крещён, но позже изменил написание своего имени на Иммануил после того, как стал изучать иврит. Его талант, как мыслителя и философа, проявился довольно рано, а прожил он довольно длинную жизнь - он умер в возрасте почти восьмидесяти лет, 12 февраля 1804 - и на развитие своей теории у него в жизни было достаточно времени. Метафизика, мораль и религия - совокупность этих понятий он рассматривал как совокупность теперь уже знакомых нам вопросов: "Что я могу знать? А вот антропология в его теории занимала высшее место и призвана была ответить на ещё один немаловажный и не менее знакомый нам вопрос: "Что такое человек? Обыкновенный человек. Или необыкновенный? Всего шестнадцати лет от роду Иммануил поступил в Кёнигсбергский университет. И так преуспел в учении, что даже стал подрабатывать, репетитором, натаскивая в науках менее одарённых сокурсников. Когда Канту исполнилось 22 года, его отец умер и на него, как на старшего сына легла ответственность за судьбу младших брата и сестёр. Ему пришлось уехать из Кёнигсберга и устроиться работать учителем в зажиточных семьях. Но, как только появилась возможность, шесть лет спустя, он вернулся в Кёнигсберг и снова занялся научной деятельностью. В жизни Кант был очень педантичным и вся жизнь его была подчинены строго регламентируемым им самим привычкам и схемам. Как пример можно привести его знаменитые послеобеденные прогулки в одно и тоже время - часы и минуты по строго определённому им самим же когда-то маршруту и в совершенно любую погоду. Соседи говорили со смехом, что по нему можно совершенно спокойно сверять часы - точно не ошибётесь!