Цитаты Гитлера на немецком языке напоминают о трагических событиях и важности мира. Выступление Гитлера на немецком. Речь гитлера текст. европейский мир. #речи. В связи с нападением на СССР Гитлер выступил с речью.
You are here
- Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года
- Excerpts of Hitler’s Speeches on German-Polish Peace, 1935-1939 | Justice for Germans
- Речь гитлера текст на немецком с переводом
- Hitler Speech: April 28, 1939
Adolf Hitler - Speech (1933) | Текст песни
Hitler's 1 September 1939 Reichstag speech is a speech made by Adolf Hitler at an Extraordinary Session of the German Reichstag on 1 September 1939, the day of the German invasion of Poland. The speech served as public declaration of war against Poland and thus of the commencement of. Лайфхаки. Музыка. Новости и СМИ. Обучение. Подкасты. My German Fellow Countrymen and Women, My Comrades! At present everybody speaks before the forum which seems to them the most fitting. Some speak before a parliament whose existence, composition and origin (are well known). I believe that I should return again today whence I came.
Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939
The speeches, letters, and proclamations of Adolph Hitler. Мартин Вютке Речь Гитлера из фильма. The speeches, letters, and proclamations of Adolph Hitler. Мартин Вютке Речь Гитлера из фильма. Гитлер выступает во время выступления 30 января 1939 года немецкий диктатор Адольф Гитлер произнес речь в Рейхстаге, которая наиболее известна своим предсказанием о.
Помогите причитать немецкий текст русскими буквами.
- Speech on the Invasion of Czechoslovakia by Adolf Hitler (Fall Grün) | Alternative History | Fandom
- Обращение Адольфа Гитлера к германскому народу 22 июня 1941
- Speech on the Invasion of Czechoslovakia by Adolf Hitler (Fall Grün) | Alternative History | Fandom
- Речь Гитлера на съезде НСДАП 1934
"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus
Лайфхаки. Музыка. Новости и СМИ. Обучение. Подкасты. причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже. Речь гитлера текст на немецком с переводом. Пользователь Никита Всадник задал вопрос в категории Политика и получил на него 4 ответа. Речь Гитлера текст. Выступление Гитлера на немецком.
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
Речь Гитлера текст. Выступление Гитлера на немецком. Adolf Hitler said in a speech: Wenn es dem internationalen Finanzjudentum in und außerhalb Europas gelingen sollte, die Völker noch einmal in einen Weltkrieg zu stürzen, dann wird das Ergebnis nicht der Sieg des Judentums sein, sondern die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa! If international. Гитлер выступает во время выступления 30 января 1939 года немецкий диктатор Адольф Гитлер произнес речь в Рейхстаге, которая наиболее известна своим предсказанием о.
Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года
Hitler at the Reichstag , 1 September 1939. For this speech, Hitler wore a field-grey military uniform, conforming with the Generalissimo rank he was assuming, rather than the brown Nazi Party uniform that he had worn for earlier speeches. The first shots of the invasion had been fired at around 4:48 am of September 1, by the battleship Schleswig-Holstein. At 5:40 am Hitler issued a declaration to the armed forces: "The Polish state has refused the peaceful settlement of relations which I desired, and appealed to arms... In order to put an end to this lunacy I have no other choice than to meet force with force from now on. But only a handful of people showed up, and the Berliners were largely apathetic, even grim, and showed no enthusiasm for the war. In my talks with Polish statesmen I discussed the ideas which you recognize from my last speech to the Reichstag... These proposals have been refused. Not only were they answered first with mobilization, but with increased terror and pressure against our German compatriots...
Все эти предложения, как вы знаете, были отклонены — предложения об ограничении вооружений и, если необходимо, разоружении, предложения об ограничении военного производства, предложения о запрещении некоторых видов современного вооружения. Вы знаете о предложениях, которые я делал для восстановления германского суверенитета над немецкими территориями. Вы знаете о моих бесконечных попытках, которые я предпринимал для мирного урегулирования вопросов с Австрией, потом с Судетской областью, Богемией и Моравией. Все они оказались напрасны. Польша обрушила нападки на свободный город Данциг. Более того, Польша не была готова уладить проблему Коридора разумным способом, с равноправным отношениям к обеим сторонам, и она не думала о соблюдении её обязательств по отношению к нацменьшинствам. Я должен заявить определённо: Германия соблюдает свои обязательства; нацменьшинства, которые проживают в Германии, не преследуются. Ни один француз не может встать и сказать, что какой-нибудь француз, живущий в Сааре, угнетён, замучен, или лишен своих прав.
Kritik ist die Selbstdarstellung der Verlierer. Intellektuelle sind Abschaum der Gesellschaft. Es gibt kein Gewissen. Das Gewissen haben die Juden erfunden. Совесть придумали евреи. Alle kreativen Ideen einer Person erscheinen im Allgemeinen bereits in seiner Jugend. Das Volk und das Vaterland sind das einzige.
They then said, "Germany must first of all be freed from its Kaiser. But the English always feel concerned for other nations, and for that reason they wanted to free Germany of its Kaiser, then as now. Finally, they said, "There shall be no more war. Therefore let us wage war upon war. If only one wanted to apply it in retrospect. That means, if one wanted to say, "We agree that war is an injustice because only brutal force decides war. We will eliminate all coercion. Hence we will abolish everything arisen through coercion up to now. But still it would have been wonderful if England had led the way to the rest of the world in its abhorrence of war in this manner, that it would have liberated the fruits of its own wars, that is, that it would have placed them again at the disposition of the rest of the world. If England had done that, if it had therefore declared: "We abhor war. Therefore, we will immediately return South Africa; because we won it through war. We hate war. Therefore, we will return the East Indies; we also won those in a war. For instance, we hate war. Therefore, we will also leave Egypt; because this also we have subjugated through force. We shall also retire from the entire Near East; because this also became ours through force. However, the struggle against war meant something entirely different in England; namely, this war against war was interpreted to mean every possibility of making good the injustices already existing in this world;... It is about the same as the attitude we recognize also in domestic policy, when people say: "We want no change in the social order. He who is rich is to stay rich; he who is poor must stay poor. As things are, so are they willed; and as they are willed, so they are to remain; for man should not rise against that which is once willed, because it is so. We see in each state and at each moment of this world the evidence of a never interrupted process of life; and it is impossible to say at a certain moment, "Here ceases this evolutionary process. It lies, on the contrary, in the essence of Nature, that ever and again... That means therefore that from the domestic life of peoples the... And so the talk of war on war has been proved quite false. The best proof for that is that the moment the war was over, the conditions for a new war could by no means be avoided, nor the instruments for waging the new war, either. It would have been a wonderful gesture if after the disarmament of Germany, as it... We suggested it to them often, begged them to at the time of the Weimar Republic, and still later demanded that they do it. They considered it not at all. On the contrary, the wars went on. Only the defeated people, the German people, lost every prospect ever in this world to change its condition once more for the better. The methods which they used in the first World War were like those with which they are fighting today. At first the war from outside, and war in the form of creating coalitions. Then he himself admits that they were never in a position to fight alone. But they guaranteed the Baltic states; they guaranteed the Balkans. They went on around: Every state in the world, they declared, needs a guarantee. Great Britain will put her whole strength behind them and will protect them. Today this same arch-liar says: "But we were really never in a position to carry on the war alone. Therefore they cooked up a coalition against us of world-wide extent. The methods have likewise remained the same. Promises to all those of little faith, the credulous, or stupid, who wanted to trust these promises, moreover, the attempt to allow their own interests to be represented with as much other blood as possible. This truth is connected with the second British method, that is, with the method of division. In that time that the British Empire had its origin, Germany tore herself apart. There were at that time modes of thought that we no longer understand, modes of thought of a religious kind, that unfortunately were fought out only with the sword, modes of thought that became horrible among the people, that seem insufficient to us in their inner being. Only these grievous internal struggles, that cost the German people endless blood, gave England the opportunity in this same period, to raise up a world claim, that never belonged to her either in number or in significance. Then I must always point out that it is not true that we Germans are like upstarts, but if one wants to talk about upstarts, then it is unconditionally the English and not ourselves! We have an older history, and in a time when Europe had a powerful German Empire, England was a quite insignificant, small, green island. In the last World War the possibilities of this splitting up lay in another sphere. Afterwards the religious problems did not provoke any more bloodshed, especially since the priests themselves would not have been ready any more to sacrifice their lives for these causes. We lived through it then. The parties of the right and the parties of the left, which further broke up in a dozen bourgeois aspects, in a half dozen proletarian aspects, and ever split up some more, and having begun with these parties, from the bourgeoisie of the bourgeois center up to the KPD Communist Party of Germany , succeeded this refers back to the parties of the right and left in undermining and breaking down the German people slowly from within. In spite of that, the course of the war was a glorious one. The years 1914-1918-they proved it: in which not even the opponents triumphed. A low, common revolt was plotted by Marxian-demoralizing-Liberal-Capitalistic subjects-behind all of it as a driving force was the eternal Jew. They brought Germany to its collapse at that time. Only the cowardice of the then rulers, their indecision, their halfway measures, their own uncertainty brought it on. And so the First World War could not alone be lost by the merit of our opponents, but exclusively by our own fault. The consequences of this collapse in November were not that world democracy stretched out open arms to Germany, were not the concern of others to free the German people from its burdens and to lift the German people to a higher standard of culture. For that they could have no concern at all, for they themselves had a much lower one. But the consequence was just their collapse, the most frightful one, politically and economically, that a people has ever experienced. At that time there came to us a man who has done the German people immeasurable harm, Woodrow Wilson, the man who lied with a straight face. If Germany would lay down her arms, then she would get a compassionate, an understanding peace! Then she would not lose her colonies! But the colonial problems were fixed up, all right! The man lyingly promised us that there would be a general disarmament, that we would then be accepted on equal terms among nations, peoples, etc. He lyingly promised us that then secret diplomacy would be done away with, and that we too would then enter into a new age of peace, of equality, of reason, etc.! Screams the last sentence. He was his right hand. Our German folk believed this man then. They had no idea that they were dealing here with an American President, that is, with a man who has no regard for truths; who, for example, can calmly say before an election: "I shall vote against war," and after the election can say: "I vote for war. So there came the hour then the German people got its disappointment at the moment when the German subordinate emissaries entered the car in the Compiegne forest, now known to us for the second time. And there right away came the rude question: "What are you gentlemen doing here? They said: "He who says that the intention is to take from Germany her... They said beforehand: "He who says that we want to take away part of the German people is inciting the people! They had broken all their promises! In a few months the German people sank into a state of unimaginably deep despair and despondency-starving people without hope any longer. A people that did not get its war-prisoners back, even after the armistice and peace-treaty had been signed! A people that was not given food, even after it was defenseless! A people that was now repeatedly coerced,-if one carefully studies those times-from whom re-subjection was again and again demanded, extorted by some new repression. When one reflects upon this even today, one falls even now into a state of burning hatred and rancor against a world in which anything like this is possible. Well, it was at that time, my racial comrades, when everything was broken up, when the upper leadership had faithlessly fled abroad, when others were surrendering, when the Wehrmacht had to give up its weapons, when the people disarmed themselves voluntarily,-it was at that time, when the agitation? It was such a mad determination in the eyes of those others, that my closest friends did not understand me. I found the strength for this determination only from my knowledge of the people. If, at that time, I had only known the upper ten thousand, believe me, my German people-I would not stand before you today, I would never have found courage for this thought which is capable of revolutionizing a people. I knew at that time first and all the people itself; I knew... I could not abandon that, for it would have been to betray my own comrades, who were just as badly... I have come to know the great mass of the German people, ladies and gentlemen, from living with them. And these masses have not only upheld my belief in the people, but have restored it, and constantly strengthened it through all the years since then, in the face of contrary circumstances, or when any misfortune seemed to threaten the realization of my plans. It was clear to me that this whole development, just as in the last 20 years or 30 years before the war, could lead only to collapse. But I had already formed the resolve to declare war on this whole development. That is not merely to declare: "I will get a German Wehrmacht, I will get an army or an air-force"; it was clear to me that the inner structure of the social order must be altered, so that in the dead body of our people the blood would flow again, and that society should hold firmly... I have always looked upon this undertaking as possible, as within the power of the country. But I was of the conviction that strength could only be given to a body in which the sight and the essence of the new condition was already incorporated. Therefore, I was resolved to build up a small movement, beginning with those people who should already have within themselves that which appeared later as really essential to the whole of society. And this was perhaps not so hard as I thought, inasmuch as I was already on guard against the danger of unworthy place-seekers or selfish persons joining my ranks. For whoever joined this movement in those years from 1919-23 had to be a boundless idealist. Any other kind of man would only say: "He is an utter fool. The man is mad. And I can say that of all my followers, all of them who at that time and later supported me: they had nothing to win, and everything to lose. And how much have they all lost for my sake. I have now begun this battle, first against stupidity, stupidity and inertia, under the so-called higher strata; I have begun it against the cowardice which spreads caste far and wide, the cowardice which always pretended to be cleverness and came around and said: "We must submit; we must be patient"; or, as Herr Erzberger said, "We must sign everything, we must sign everything they put before us; then they will forgive us; then it will be all right again. Often we have experienced... And we were not quiet. I then formed the program: "The German language belongs to the German. And I had at that time to fight on further against selfish? The man of the Left said to me: "You are going against my interests" or "You are going against my interests. My interests are class interests. And these class interests oblige me to slay the other fellow. We have the interests of station, we too have our interests,... Do not come in here! And above the interests which seemed to be found in station or in class, stood sic the interests which lie in the folk, in that community which cannot be torn apart, all this appears today to be so obvious a thing to get all these... One group did not want to accept this idea,... We want our old filth... Eventually you will even demand of me that I should add one... To me also it is obvious, we want... All that was thus not so simple, slowly to draw one thing after another out of this people, and how many have quite simply run away from it. It was not, indeed, my national comrades, as if every one who came to me at that time, on that account also remained with me. Many a time I had to bring fifty or sixty somewhere... All the others were gone again. And one had to begin again. I made a calculation at that time. If I win a hundred over, and have only ten remain to me, and the other ninety always leave me, then gradually they will become a hundred if I win a thousand. If I win ten thousand, they will be a thousand, and gradually the number of those who remain will grow ever larger. And if one had departed for the second or third time, perhaps, then perhaps he will be embarrassed to go the fifth time, and then he too will remain. And thus, with unbelievable patience and with perseverance and persistence I will slowly build up a group that is a majority in the German Reich itself.
Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939
By force they made one state after another pay them tribute and become their servants. In this manner England has subjugated the world over a period of a few hundred years; and, to make secure this conquest of the world, this subjugation of people, England endeavors to maintain the so-called balance of power in Europe. This means in reality that it endeavors to make sure that no European state is able to win over a certain measure... What they wanted was a disunited, disintegrated Europe, a Europe all of whose forces completely offset one another.
To reach this goal, England conducted one war after another in Europe. She has seen first its powerful position menaced by Spain. When they had finally conquered Spain, they turned their attentions to the Netherlanders.
When Holland seemed to represent no further danger, British hate concentrated itself against France. And when finally France was crushed with the help of all Europe, to be sure, they then imagined that Germany must be, of necessity, the one factor which might possibly be suited to the unification of Europe. Then it was that the struggle against Germany began, not out of love for the nations, but only in their own most sober interests.
It is well-known that they have always been the instigators of unrest among the nations, because they were able to profit only in time of unrest, and because a period of peace might lead to reflection and hence, also, to an insight into the ways of these evil-doers of all nations. When, in 1914,a world coalition against the German Reich of that time was first brewing,... They then said, "Germany must first of all be freed from its Kaiser.
But the English always feel concerned for other nations, and for that reason they wanted to free Germany of its Kaiser, then as now. Finally, they said, "There shall be no more war. Therefore let us wage war upon war.
If only one wanted to apply it in retrospect. That means, if one wanted to say, "We agree that war is an injustice because only brutal force decides war. We will eliminate all coercion.
Hence we will abolish everything arisen through coercion up to now. But still it would have been wonderful if England had led the way to the rest of the world in its abhorrence of war in this manner, that it would have liberated the fruits of its own wars, that is, that it would have placed them again at the disposition of the rest of the world. If England had done that, if it had therefore declared: "We abhor war.
Therefore, we will immediately return South Africa; because we won it through war. We hate war. Therefore, we will return the East Indies; we also won those in a war.
For instance, we hate war. Therefore, we will also leave Egypt; because this also we have subjugated through force. We shall also retire from the entire Near East; because this also became ours through force.
However, the struggle against war meant something entirely different in England; namely, this war against war was interpreted to mean every possibility of making good the injustices already existing in this world;... It is about the same as the attitude we recognize also in domestic policy, when people say: "We want no change in the social order. He who is rich is to stay rich; he who is poor must stay poor.
As things are, so are they willed; and as they are willed, so they are to remain; for man should not rise against that which is once willed, because it is so. We see in each state and at each moment of this world the evidence of a never interrupted process of life; and it is impossible to say at a certain moment, "Here ceases this evolutionary process. It lies, on the contrary, in the essence of Nature, that ever and again...
That means therefore that from the domestic life of peoples the... And so the talk of war on war has been proved quite false. The best proof for that is that the moment the war was over, the conditions for a new war could by no means be avoided, nor the instruments for waging the new war, either.
It would have been a wonderful gesture if after the disarmament of Germany, as it... We suggested it to them often, begged them to at the time of the Weimar Republic, and still later demanded that they do it. They considered it not at all.
On the contrary, the wars went on. Only the defeated people, the German people, lost every prospect ever in this world to change its condition once more for the better. The methods which they used in the first World War were like those with which they are fighting today.
At first the war from outside, and war in the form of creating coalitions. Then he himself admits that they were never in a position to fight alone. But they guaranteed the Baltic states; they guaranteed the Balkans.
They went on around: Every state in the world, they declared, needs a guarantee. Great Britain will put her whole strength behind them and will protect them. Today this same arch-liar says: "But we were really never in a position to carry on the war alone.
Therefore they cooked up a coalition against us of world-wide extent. The methods have likewise remained the same. Promises to all those of little faith, the credulous, or stupid, who wanted to trust these promises, moreover, the attempt to allow their own interests to be represented with as much other blood as possible.
This truth is connected with the second British method, that is, with the method of division. In that time that the British Empire had its origin, Germany tore herself apart. There were at that time modes of thought that we no longer understand, modes of thought of a religious kind, that unfortunately were fought out only with the sword, modes of thought that became horrible among the people, that seem insufficient to us in their inner being.
Only these grievous internal struggles, that cost the German people endless blood, gave England the opportunity in this same period, to raise up a world claim, that never belonged to her either in number or in significance. Then I must always point out that it is not true that we Germans are like upstarts, but if one wants to talk about upstarts, then it is unconditionally the English and not ourselves! We have an older history, and in a time when Europe had a powerful German Empire, England was a quite insignificant, small, green island.
In the last World War the possibilities of this splitting up lay in another sphere. Afterwards the religious problems did not provoke any more bloodshed, especially since the priests themselves would not have been ready any more to sacrifice their lives for these causes. We lived through it then.
The parties of the right and the parties of the left, which further broke up in a dozen bourgeois aspects, in a half dozen proletarian aspects, and ever split up some more, and having begun with these parties, from the bourgeoisie of the bourgeois center up to the KPD Communist Party of Germany , succeeded this refers back to the parties of the right and left in undermining and breaking down the German people slowly from within. In spite of that, the course of the war was a glorious one. The years 1914-1918-they proved it: in which not even the opponents triumphed.
A low, common revolt was plotted by Marxian-demoralizing-Liberal-Capitalistic subjects-behind all of it as a driving force was the eternal Jew. They brought Germany to its collapse at that time. Only the cowardice of the then rulers, their indecision, their halfway measures, their own uncertainty brought it on.
And so the First World War could not alone be lost by the merit of our opponents, but exclusively by our own fault. The consequences of this collapse in November were not that world democracy stretched out open arms to Germany, were not the concern of others to free the German people from its burdens and to lift the German people to a higher standard of culture. For that they could have no concern at all, for they themselves had a much lower one.
But the consequence was just their collapse, the most frightful one, politically and economically, that a people has ever experienced. At that time there came to us a man who has done the German people immeasurable harm, Woodrow Wilson, the man who lied with a straight face. If Germany would lay down her arms, then she would get a compassionate, an understanding peace!
Then she would not lose her colonies! But the colonial problems were fixed up, all right! The man lyingly promised us that there would be a general disarmament, that we would then be accepted on equal terms among nations, peoples, etc.
He lyingly promised us that then secret diplomacy would be done away with, and that we too would then enter into a new age of peace, of equality, of reason, etc.! Screams the last sentence. He was his right hand.
Our German folk believed this man then. They had no idea that they were dealing here with an American President, that is, with a man who has no regard for truths; who, for example, can calmly say before an election: "I shall vote against war," and after the election can say: "I vote for war. So there came the hour then the German people got its disappointment at the moment when the German subordinate emissaries entered the car in the Compiegne forest, now known to us for the second time.
And there right away came the rude question: "What are you gentlemen doing here? They said: "He who says that the intention is to take from Germany her... They said beforehand: "He who says that we want to take away part of the German people is inciting the people!
They had broken all their promises! In a few months the German people sank into a state of unimaginably deep despair and despondency-starving people without hope any longer. A people that did not get its war-prisoners back, even after the armistice and peace-treaty had been signed!
A people that was not given food, even after it was defenseless! A people that was now repeatedly coerced,-if one carefully studies those times-from whom re-subjection was again and again demanded, extorted by some new repression. When one reflects upon this even today, one falls even now into a state of burning hatred and rancor against a world in which anything like this is possible.
Well, it was at that time, my racial comrades, when everything was broken up, when the upper leadership had faithlessly fled abroad, when others were surrendering, when the Wehrmacht had to give up its weapons, when the people disarmed themselves voluntarily,-it was at that time, when the agitation? It was such a mad determination in the eyes of those others, that my closest friends did not understand me. I found the strength for this determination only from my knowledge of the people.
If, at that time, I had only known the upper ten thousand, believe me, my German people-I would not stand before you today, I would never have found courage for this thought which is capable of revolutionizing a people. I knew at that time first and all the people itself; I knew... I could not abandon that, for it would have been to betray my own comrades, who were just as badly...
I have come to know the great mass of the German people, ladies and gentlemen, from living with them. And these masses have not only upheld my belief in the people, but have restored it, and constantly strengthened it through all the years since then, in the face of contrary circumstances, or when any misfortune seemed to threaten the realization of my plans. It was clear to me that this whole development, just as in the last 20 years or 30 years before the war, could lead only to collapse.
But I had already formed the resolve to declare war on this whole development. That is not merely to declare: "I will get a German Wehrmacht, I will get an army or an air-force"; it was clear to me that the inner structure of the social order must be altered, so that in the dead body of our people the blood would flow again, and that society should hold firmly... I have always looked upon this undertaking as possible, as within the power of the country.
But I was of the conviction that strength could only be given to a body in which the sight and the essence of the new condition was already incorporated. Therefore, I was resolved to build up a small movement, beginning with those people who should already have within themselves that which appeared later as really essential to the whole of society. And this was perhaps not so hard as I thought, inasmuch as I was already on guard against the danger of unworthy place-seekers or selfish persons joining my ranks.
For whoever joined this movement in those years from 1919-23 had to be a boundless idealist. Any other kind of man would only say: "He is an utter fool. The man is mad.
And I can say that of all my followers, all of them who at that time and later supported me: they had nothing to win, and everything to lose. And how much have they all lost for my sake. I have now begun this battle, first against stupidity, stupidity and inertia, under the so-called higher strata; I have begun it against the cowardice which spreads caste far and wide, the cowardice which always pretended to be cleverness and came around and said: "We must submit; we must be patient"; or, as Herr Erzberger said, "We must sign everything, we must sign everything they put before us; then they will forgive us; then it will be all right again.
Often we have experienced... And we were not quiet. I then formed the program: "The German language belongs to the German.
And I had at that time to fight on further against selfish? The man of the Left said to me: "You are going against my interests" or "You are going against my interests. My interests are class interests.
And these class interests oblige me to slay the other fellow. We have the interests of station, we too have our interests,... Do not come in here!
And above the interests which seemed to be found in station or in class, stood sic the interests which lie in the folk, in that community which cannot be torn apart, all this appears today to be so obvious a thing to get all these... One group did not want to accept this idea,... We want our old filth...
Geschichte wurde nie zu einer Zahl gemacht! Kritik ist die Selbstdarstellung der Verlierer. Intellektuelle sind Abschaum der Gesellschaft. Es gibt kein Gewissen. Das Gewissen haben die Juden erfunden. Совесть придумали евреи.
Alle kreativen Ideen einer Person erscheinen im Allgemeinen bereits in seiner Jugend.
Германия не готова, чтобы дать согласие Советской России на создание военных баз вдоль проливов. Национал-социалисты, здесь я был обязан в полном осознании своей ответственности проявить свою позицию как ответственный лидер не только Германии, но и как представитель европейской культуры и цивилизации. Последствием всего этого было возрастание активности Советской России направленной прямо против Германии, и сразу, конкретно, начались новые попытки подрыва румынского государства и попытки посредством пропаганды устранить болгарскую монархию. С помощью запутанных и незрелых лидеров Румынского Легиона прим. И тем не менее, я всё ещё верил, что самое лучшее, — продолжать молчать.
Немедленно после неудачной попытки государственного переворота в Румынии, Советская Россия предприняла новую переброску войск на восточные границы Германии. Советские танковые подразделения и парашютисты во всё возрастающих количествах перебрасывались в опасную близость от германской границы. Германские вооружённые силы и германский народ знают, что вплоть до нескольких недель назад ни одной механизированной дивизии или даже единственного танка не было дислоцировано на наших восточных границах. Если, несмотря на все разуверения и камуфляж, и требовалось какое-либо окончательное доказательство формирующегося союза между Англией и Советской Россией, то Югославский конфликт предоставил его. Когда я предпринимал любые усилия, направленные на создание мира на Балканах, и из-за симпатетической кооперации с Муссолини, пригласил Югославию присоединиться к «Трёхстороннему Пакту», Англия и Советская Россия в объединённом сговоре организовали государственный переворот, который за одну ночь устранил тогдашнее правительство Югославии, которое тогда было готово подписать соглашение. И сегодня мы можем проинформировать германскую нацию, что югославский путч против Германии не был только английским, но в основном под Советским руководством!
Поскольку мы молчали и тут, советские вожди тут же сделали шаг дальше. Они не только организовали Путч, но и через несколько дней, в своём стремлении воспротивиться установлению мира на Балканах, заключили Договор о дружбе и взаимопомощи с Югославией и восстановили её против Германии. И это отнюдь не было платонической дружбой. Москва потребовала мобилизации югославской армии. И поскольку даже тогда я предпочёл лучше ничего не говорить, те, кто во власти в Кремле, пошли ещё дальше. Германское правительство сегодня обладает документальным свидетельством, которое показывает, что правительство Советской России, для того чтобы втянуть в войну Югославию, дало ей обещание снабжать её через порт Салоники Греция оружием, самолётами, амуницией и другим военным материалом против Германии www.
И это случилось именно в тот самый момент, когда я лично, в моей всегдашней надеже служить делу мира, дал совет японскому министру иностранных дел Yosike Matsuoka, который уменьшил трения России с Японией. Только быстрое продвижение наших несравненных дивизий к Скопле в Македонии - подробнее здесь www. Лётчики югославской армии, однако, бежали в Советскую Россию и были тут же приняты как союзники. Победа Германии и Италии в Юго-Восточной Европе первым делом затормозила план летом 1941 года вовлечь Германию в долгомесячную войну на Балканах, тем временем наращивая преднаступательное развёртывание советских армий и повышая их боеспособность для того, чтобы в конечном итоге вместе с Англией, при поддержке американского снабжения сокрушить Германию и Италию. Таким образом Москва не только нарушила, но и постыдно предала положения нашего дружеского соглашения. Всё это было проделано, в то время как правители в Кремле, аналогично как и в случае с Финляндией и Румынией, до последнего момента претендовали на мир и дружбу и с честными глазами выражали официальные опровержения.
И хотя до сего момента я был вынужден снова и снова хранить молчание под давлением обстоятельств, теперь пришёл момент, когда продолжать оставаться просто наблюдателем было бы не только грехом, но и преступлением против германского народа — и да, даже преступлением против всей Европы. Сегодня 160 советских дивизий стоят на наших границах! В течение многих недель идёт постоянное нарушение этой границы от крайнего севера и до самой Румынии. Советские лётчики не считают нужным соблюдать воздушные границы; возможно, чтобы показать нам, что они уже чувствуют себя хозяевами этих территорий. В течение ночи с 17-ого на 18-ого июня 1941 года советские вооруженные отряды снова углубились на германскую территорию и возвратились обратно только после продолжительного боя. Это всё привело нас к часу, когда для нас необходимо предпринять шаги против этого заговора между еврейскими англо-саксонскими поджигателями войны и такими же еврейскими правителями большевистского центра в Москве.
Германский народ, — в настоящее время создаётся марш, который по своей протяжённости не имеет себе аналогов в истории. Совместно с нашими финскими друзьями, победители англичан под Нарвиком стоят у Полярного Круга. Германские дивизии под командованием покорителей Норвегии в кооперации с героями финской свободы, с их маршалом, защищают свою землю. Формации германского восточного фронта простираются от Восточной Пруссии до Карпат.
For two whole days I sat with my Government and waited to see whether it was convenient for the Polish Government to send a plenipotentiary or not... Deputies, if the German Government and its Leader patiently endured such treatment Germany would deserve only to disappear from the political stage.
But I am wrongly judged if my love of peace and my patience are mistaken for weakness or even cowardice... These proposals for mediation have failed... Hitler then spoke of the Molotov—Ribbentrop Pact , which had been signed just ten days before, on August 23. I no longer see any reason why [Germany and Russia] should still oppose one another.... We have, therefore, resolved to conclude a pact which rules out for ever any use of violence between us... Russia and Germany fought against one another in the World War.
Последняя речь Гитлера в бункере перед смертью. Почему её так долго скрывали от народа
And, besides, it was work that made people come together and divide the work among them. We know that the moment the individual work to sustain oneself turned into work within communities, the community tended to assign a particular work to those particularly talented, and with increasing division of work it became necessary for still greater joining together into still bigger groups. So, it is work which created kinships at first, later tribes, and still later, led to the creation of states. If we see, as the first prerequisite for creating states, the conception of work as social duty, so the second necessary ingredient is racial health and purity. And nothing helped the northern conquerors more against the lazy and rotten southern races than the refined strength of their race. States would remain an empty vessel if not decorated with that which we normally call culture. If we removed everything and kept just railways, ships, etc.
The moment their great, inborn imagination could act in great, free areas, it created everywhere immortal works. We see this process repeated continuously even in the smallest scale. Similarly, we know that great minds are often born at the bottom of society, unable to develop there but, given an opportunity, they begin to grow and become leaders in arts, sciences, and also in politics. We know today that there are extensive interrelations between the state, nation, culture, art and work and it would be madness to think that any of them could exist independently of the others. Let us take art — considered as an international domain — and we shall see that it is unconditionally dependent on the state. Art blossomed in those areas where the political development made it possible.
The art of Greece reached its highest level when the young state had triumphed over invading Persian armies. Construction of the Acropolis began at that time. Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time. We know that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended on political development of these towns; that it was political considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den Linden. Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the rank of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany must visit.
The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small, powerless statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art, proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner appeared in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a unified, great German Reich. And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of the state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its citizens and let them use their talents. The opposite is the case with the race in relation to everything else. A state with a rotten, sick and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make great politics, or at least bask in abundance.
Each of these factors depends on the others. And only when all of them complement each other, can we say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics understand it. Can the Jew build a state? Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state? First we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives the principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The Bible.
I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily true, as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing, however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite. Laughter It is very important because no antisemite would have been able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race than the Bible, the Old Testament. Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment — otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive of work as punishment.
I must confess: I would not have been able to exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90 or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the Land of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. Calls: Hear, hear We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one another in the face. Laughter We are unable to bear absolute rest. Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion which Jewry has about work.
For them work is not an obvious ethical duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers. The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it work, but robbery. Calls: Hear, hear When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another.
I have already explained that in the long period in the North the races became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and without selection. And therefore we see a generation which is plagued by defects caused by inbreeding. Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally looks like.
You all know him. Laughter You know his constant restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he is calculating dividends. Laughter The Jew has never had his own art. Hear, hear His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second — the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing.
We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for. Laughter When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat.
Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today. Because a people which does not want to work — the often hard work of building and maintaining a state — to work in mines, factories, in construction etc. Such a people will never establish a state but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good German — a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in ancient times. Lively bravo! Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers. Laughter If these people really have this urge in themselves, Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners; they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes etc.
The whole Zionist state will be nothing else than the perfect high school for their international criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will, of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state Laughter and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of Palestine. Laughter One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything stems from his race. A Jew is everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely represents the interests of his race. Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear — socialism, community spirit, common good before own good.
Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism. He cannot do otherwise, whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his own state because it requires a lot of social sense. He is only able to live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race amongst other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which must be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil.
The Jewish path of destruction We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It is not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible. In general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry. We see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these words quite innocuously. It did not appear to him as outrageous when a race, through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their ideals, always ready to offer even their own families.
We know that not long ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life.
Выступление Гитлера с переводом.
Гитлер 1941 речь. Речь Адольфа Гитлера на немецком текст на немецком. Гитлеровские речи на немецком.
Речь Гитлера слова. Текст Гитлера. Речь Гитлера перед нападением.
Речь Гитлера 1 сентября 1939 года. Речь Гитлера перед нападением на Польшу. Речь Гитлера в Рейхстаге.
Речь Гитлера в Рейхстаге 1 сентября 1939 года. Речь Гитлера по радио. Речь Гитлера транскрипция.
Речь Гитлера оригинал. Речь Гитлера с переводом. Лекция Гитлера на немецком.
Адольф Гитлер в Сталинграде. Газета новое слово. Немецкая газета правда фальшивая.
Текст Гитлера на немецком. Выступление Гитлера на немецком языке. Речь Адольфа Гитлера на немецком.
Выступление Адольфа Гитлера на немецком. Немецкие газеты 1941 года. Немецкие газеты Гитлер.
Речь Гитлера на русском. Данциг Гитлер. Обращение Гитлера к немецкому народу.
Речь Гитлера 22 июня 1941. Выступление Гитлера текст. Речь фюрера текст.
Речь перед войной. Выступление Гитлера 22 июня 1941 года. Текст речи Гитлера 22 июня 1941 года.
Воззвание фюрера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941. Немецкая речь текст на немецком. Выступление Гитлера на немецком текст.
Выступление Гитлера 31 июля 1940 года. Речь Гитлера перед атакой на Польшу. Памятка немецкого солдата.
Памятка немецкого солдата 1941. Памятка советскому солдату в Германии. Памятка солдата вермахта.
Обращение Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941. Обращение Гитлера к немецкому народу 22. Обращение гиьрела на немецком.
Речь Гитлера о большевизме. Из речи Гитлера в Мюнхене 9 ноября 1942 ответы на вопросы кратко. Адольф Гитлер плакаты.
He did the same 2000 years ago, and we know that this new Teaching was nothing else than a resurrection of the old truism that people in a state should have legal rights and, above all, that equal duties should give equal rights. This obvious Teaching was gradually turned against the Jew himself, as the similar Teaching of socialism has to turn on the Hebrew race today, its distorters and corrupters. We know that throughout the middle Ages the Jew infiltrated all European states, behaving like a parasite, using new principles and ways which the people did not know then. And from a nomad he became a greedy and bloodthirsty robber of our time. And he went so far that people after people rebelled and attempted to shake him off.
We know it is untrue when people say that the Jew was forced to this activity; he could easily acquire land. And he did acquire land but not to work it but in order to use it as a trade object, just as he does today. Our forefathers were wiser; they knew that land was holy and they excluded the Jew from it, Lively ovation and if the Jew ever had the intention to tend the land and build a state, he could easily have done so at the time when whole new continents were discovered. He could easily have done it if only he used a small part of his power, craftiness, cunning, brutality and ruthlessness, as well as some of his financial resources. Because if this power was sufficient to subdue whole peoples, it would have been more than sufficient to build their own state.
If only he had had the basic condition for this, which is a will to work, but not in the sense of usurious trade but in the sense in which millions work in order to keep a state going. Instead, we see him also today as a destroyer. In these days we see a great transformation: the Jew was once a Court Jew, submissive to his master he knew how to make the master pliable in order to dominate his subjects. For this purpose he whetted the appetites of these great men for unattainable things, extended the credit and soon turned them into debtors. In this way he himself got power over peoples.
And he played this game with the same cruelty as, a few years later, the humanistic and philanthropic Jew whose wealth did not suffer at all when he showed his humanitarianism and his spirit of sacrifice to our people. Because he felt that the ground began to burn under his feet. The ethical duty to work Gradually, he also had to lead an existential struggle against the growing awakening and anger of the people. This forced him to lay his hands on the inner structure of the states if he wanted to remain the master of the peoples. We see the resulting destruction in three areas, namely those same three areas which were preserving and developing the states.
The first area was the fight against the principle of the ethical duty to work. The Jew had found another kind of work for himself where he could earn gold without practically moving a finger. He developed a principle which, throughout millennia, made it possible for him to amass fortunes without sweat and toil, unlike all other mortals, and above all — without taking risk. What is industrial capital? It is a constantly changing factor, a relative concept.
Once it was a needle and thread, a workshop and a couple of cents in ready money which a tailor in Nurnberg possessed in the 13th century. It was a sum that made work possible, that is: tools, workshops and a certain amount of money in order to survive for a period of time. Gradually, this small workshop became a big factory. But workshops and tools, machines and factories have, per se, no value able to produce value but are a means to an end. What produces value is work, and the few cents which made it possible to survive difficult times and buy some fabrics, multiplied through time, stand before us today — we call it Capital for continued operation in bad times, that is Working Capital.
Here I want to emphasize one thing: Tools, workshop, machine, factory — or working capital, that is, industrial capital — against this you cannot fight at all. You can perhaps make sure that it is not abused but you cannot fight against it. This is the first major scam that one makes to our people, and they make it to distract us from the real fight, to pull it off from the capital which should and must be fought — from the loan and financial capital. Stormy bravo! This capital arises in a very different way.
The smallest master craftsman was dependent on the fate that might affect him every day, on the general situation in the middle Ages, perhaps on the size of his city and its prosperity, the security in this city. Also today is this capital, that is, the industrial capital tied to the state and to the people, depending on the will of the people to work, but depending also on the possibility to procure raw materials in order to be able to offer work and find buyers who will really buy the product. And we know that a collapse of the state, under certain circumstances, renders the greatest values worthless, devalues them, as distinguished from the other capital, the finance and loan capital, which accrues interest very evenly without any regard to whether the owner, for example, of these 10,000 Mark himself passes away or not. The debt remains on the estate. We know that this railway fortunately has now a 20 billion deficit but their bonds must bear interest, and even though they were sold, in part, more than 60 years ago and have already been repaid four times, the debt, the interest, runs further, and while a great nation gains nothing on this company, it still must bleed; the loan capital continues to grow completely irrespective of any outside disturbance.
Here we already see the first possibility, namely that this kind of money-making, which is independent of all the events and incidents of daily life, must necessarily, because it is never hindered and always runs evenly, gradually lead to huge capitals which are so enormous that they ultimately have only one fault, namely the difficulty of their further accommodation. To accommodate this capital, you have to proceed to destroying whole states, to destroy entire cultures, to abolish national industries — not to socialize, but to throw all into the jaws of this international capital — because this capital is international, as the only thing on this Earth that is truly international. It is international because its carrier, the Jews, are international through their distribution across the world. Consent And already here one should knock oneself on the head and say: if this capital is international because its carrier is distributed internationally, it must be madness to think that this capital can be fought internationally with the help of the members of the same race which possesses it. Hear, hear Fire is not extinguished by fire but by water and the international capital belonging to the international Jew can only be broken by a national force.
Bravo and applause! So, this capital has grown to incredibly large proportions and today virtually rules the Earth, still eerily growing and — the worst! For it is appalling that the common man who has to bear the burden in order to return the capital sees that, despite his hard work, diligence, thrift and in spite of the real work, he is hardly able to nourish himself and still less to dress, while this international capital devours billions just in interest, which he also must supply, and at the same time a whole racial stratum which does no other work than collect interest and cut coupons, spreads in the state. This is a degradation of any honest work, for every honestly working man must ask today: Does it have a purpose at all that I work? Yes, one of the foundations of our strength is being destroyed, namely the ethical concept of work, and that was the brilliant idea of Karl Marx to falsify the ethical concept of work, and the whole mass of the people who groan under the Capital are to be organized for the destruction of the national economy and for the protection of international finance-and-loan capital.
Stormy applause We know that today 15 billion of industry capital is facing 500 billion of loan capital. These 15 billion of industry capital is invested in creative values, while this 500 billion loan capital, which we always get in spoonful rates of 6 and 7 billion and which we use in periods of 1 to 2 months to supplement our rations a little, these 6 to 7 billion today which are decreed almost worthless scraps of paper, at a later date, should we ever recover, will have to be repaid in high quality money i. This is not only the destruction of a state, but already the application of a chain, of a neck collar for later times. National purity as a source of strength The second pillar against which the Jew as a parasite turns, and must turn, is the national purity as a source of the strength of a nation. The Jew, who is himself a nationalist more than any other nation, who through millennia did not mix with any other race, uses intermingling just for others to degenerate them in the best case; this same Jew preaches every day with thousands of tongues, from 19,000 papers in Germany alone, that all nations on Earth are equal, that international solidarity should bind all the peoples, that no people can lay a claim to a special status etc.
What a nation means, he, who himself never dreams of climbing down to those to whom he preaches internationalism, knows well. First a race must be denationalized. First it must unlearn that its power is in its blood, and when it has reached the level where it has no more pride, the result is a product, a second race, which is lower than the previous one and the Jew needs the lower one in order to organize his final world domination. In order to build it and keep it, he lowers the racial level of the other peoples, so that only he is racially pure and able to eventually rule over all the others. We know that the Hindus in India are a mixed people, stemming from the high Aryan immigrants and from the dark aborigines.
And this nation bears the consequences, for it is a slave nation of a race that may seem in many ways almost as a second Jewry. Another problem is the problem of physical decomposition of races. The Jew is trying to eliminate all of which he knows that is somehow strengthening, muscle-steeling, and eliminate above all everything of that which he knows may keep a race so healthy that it will remain determined not to tolerate among themselves national criminals, pests to the national community, but under some circumstances, punish them with death. And that is his great fear and worry; for even the heaviest latches of the safest prison are not so tough, and the prison is not so safe that a few million could not open it eventually. Only one lock is permanent, and that is death, and in front of it he has the most awe.
And therefore he seeks to abolish this barbaric punishment everywhere where he lives as a parasite. But wherever he already is, Lord, it is used ruthlessly. Loud applause And, for the breaking of physical strength, he has excellent means at hand. First of all, he has the trade that should be nothing more than distribution of foodstuffs and other necessary items for daily use. He uses it to withdraw these articles of daily life, when necessary, in order to raise the price on the one hand, but also to withdraw in order to create the conditions for physical weakening which have always worked best: hunger.
Everywhere, what we see behind these organizations is not the desire to make a shining organization for food supply, but through them gradually to create hunger. We know that as a politician he never had reason and cause to shun the hunger, on the contrary, wherever the Jew appeared in political parties, hunger and misery was the only soil in which he could grow. He desires it, and therefore he does not even think of easing social misery. He was a leading proponent of a policy of assimilation for German Jews ] Hand in hand with this goes a battle against the health of the people. He knows how to turn all the healthy normal manners, the obvious hygienic rules of a race on its head, from night he makes day; he creates the notorious nightlife and knows exactly that it works slowly but surely, gradually destroying the healthy strength of a race, making it soft; the one is destroyed physically, the other spiritually, and into the heart of the third it puts the hatred as he has to see the others feast.
And finally, as a last resort, he destroys the productive capacity, and if necessary, in connection with it, the productive resources of a nation. That is the great mystery of Russia. They have destroyed factories, not because they knew they would no longer be needed, but because they knew that the people would be forced, with enormous hardships, to replace what had been destroyed. So the Jew succeeds in harnessing the people, instead of the former 9 and 10 hours, for 12 hours. For at the moment when the Jew becomes Lord, he knows no 8-hour day, he recognizes his Sabbath for his cattle, but not for the Goyim, for the Akum [words for non-Jews].
The destruction of culture Finally, he reaches for the last method: The destruction of all culture, of all that we consider as belonging in a state which we consider civilized. Here is his work perhaps most difficult to recognize, but here the actual effect is the most terrible. This is true inner experience, unlike the other ones, which are only superficial swindle Applause , set in the world with an intent to gradually destroy in the people any healthy idea and to whip the people into a state in which no one can understand whether the times are crazy, or whether he himself is mad. Big laughter and applause. Just as he works in painting, sculpture and music, so he does in poetry and especially in literature.
Here he has a great advantage. What has become of it? A place which today you are ashamed to enter unless someone might notice you the moment you go in. And if theater has become a hotbed of vice and shamelessness, then a thousand times more so that new invention which perhaps comes from genial inspiration, but which the Jew understood right away to remodel into the filthiest business that you can imagine: the cinema. Thunderous applause and clapping.
At first people attached greatest hopes to this brilliant invention. It could become an easy mediator of profound knowledge for the entire people of the world. And what has become of it?
Среди них было 160 тысяч граждан Германии. И на всё это я должен был закрыть глаза. Я был обязан молчать. В конце концов, это я сам захотел достигнуть разрядки напряжённости и, если возможно, то и полного мира с этим государством. Однако во время нашего общего вступления в Польшу, кремлёвские правители внезапно и в противоречии с договором также затребовали и Литву.
Германия никогда не имела намерений оккупировать Литву. И Германия не только оказалась не способной предъявить такой же ультиматум литовскому правительству, но и отвергла запрос Литвы прислать германские войска, потому что это требование было не в соответствии с целями германской политики. Но несмотря на это, я подчинился и этому новому требованию Кремля. Однако это было только началом шантажа и всё новых и новых вымогательств. Победа в Польше, которая была достигнута исключительно германскими войсками, предоставила мне возможность ещё раз обратиться к западным странам с предложением мира. Это предложение мира в очередной раз было отвергнуто, как и всегда, благодаря интернациональным усилиям еврейских поджигателей войны. В это время причиной такого отказа был тот факт, что Англия ещё надеялась мобилизовать против Германии коалицию европейских стран, включавшую Балканские страны и Советскую Россию. Поэтому Лондон решил послать Mr.
Cripps посланником в Москву. Криппс получил чёткие инструкции любыми средствами втянуть Советскую Россию в проанглийскую коалицию. Английская пресса сообщала об этой миссии, поскольку её никак нельзя было скрыть. Осенью 1939 года и весной 1940 года первые результаты этой миссии Криппса дали себя знать. В то время как Советская Россия предприняла попытку подчинить военной силой не только Финляндию, но и Балтийские страны, она вдруг начала обосновывать свои действия настолько же смехотворными, насколько они были и фальшивыми утверждениями, что, дескать, она должна «защитить эти страны от внешней угрозы». Эта «внешняя угроза» означала только Германию; никакая другая страна не имела доступа в балтийский бассейн и не могла там угрожать. Но я вынужден был молчать. Но те, кто был у власти в Кремле, немедленно пошли ещё дальше.
В то время как весной 1940 года Германия, в соответствии с так называемым «Пактом о Ненападении», отозвала свои войска с восточной границы и на самом деле, большая часть восточной границы была тотально очищена от немецких войск , концентрация российских войск на западной границе уже началась, что уже можно было рассматривать как целенаправленную угрозу Германии. В соответствии с заявлением советского министра иностранных дел, а затем премьер-министра Вячеслава Молотова, персонально сделанным в то время, у Советов было уже весной 1940 года 22 дивизии только в одной Прибалтике. И в то время как само советское правительство всегда утверждало, что войска, дескать, были введены по просьбе местного населения Прибалтики, цель их продолжающегося присутствия была демонстрация своей силы Германии. В то время как наши солдаты с 5 мая 1940 года уничтожали англо-французские силы на западе, концентрация советских войск и их манёвры на нашей восточной границе приобретали всё более и более угрожающие размеры. Поэтому, в интересах Германии, я с августа 1940 года уже не мог более позволить нашими восточным провинциям, тем более что они к этому времени вообще зачастую были пустыми, оставаться незащищёнными ввиду беспрецедентного нарастания числа большевистских дивизий. Это всё был результат англо-советской кооперации, направленной на создание на востоке такой мощной армейской группировки, чтобы Германское Командование не смогло бы закончить блицкриг на западе полным разгромом, особенно, что касается в части военно-воздушных сил. И всё это было в соответствии не только с английской, но и советской политикой; поскольку и Англия, и Советская Россия имели ввиду затягивать войну как можно дольше, чтобы постепенно ослаблять и ослаблять всю Европу и сделать её совсем неспособной. Анализируя, атака СССР на Румынию была также направлена на овладение важной материальной базой не только Германии, но и всеевропейской экономики и, по меньшей мере, имела ввиду разрушить её.
Германия, особенно с 1933 года, с непрерывным терпением искала возможности наладить торговлю со странами юго-восточной Европы. Поэтому мы всегда были заинтересованы во внутреннем спокойствии и внутренней организации этих стран. Советское нападение на Румынию и связка Греции с Англией грозили в короткое время превратить этот регион в театр войны. Прямо противоположно своим принципам и срочной просьбе румынского правительства, которое само несло ответственность именно за такое развитие событий, я советовал им принятие советских требований ради мира и уступку Бессарабии Молдавии.
Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939
Избавление России от марксизма Возможно, Россия избавится от еврейского марксизма, но воплотит в жизнь панславизм в самой яростной и свирепой форме. США под ярмом нью-йоркского еврейства, обладающего интеллектом обезьяны, пойдут ко дну. Хрупкость США Огромная материальная мощь в сочетании с огромной нехваткой интеллекта, не даст стране выработать умную доктрину развития. В итоге, белым не удастся сохранить доминирование на континенте. Права голодающих народов Падение США предоставит шанс желтой расе вторгнуться на американский континент. Шансы на выживание для мужественного народа Шанс на выживание останутся только у той белой нации, кто сможет искоренить еврейство. Как мы видим, при осмысленном прочтении, речь Гитлера содержит достаточно понятные и точные прогнозы будущего мирового развития за исключением последних двух пунктов. Вторжения желтой расы на американский континент еще не произошло.
Die Agenda? Weltweit ist das der Fall. Deutschland ist Paradebeispiel.
Damit ist Schluss. Lasse dich nicht beeindrucken davon, dass es derzeit bedrohlich kracht. Ha, da mache ich nicht mit.
Ha, ich will konstruktiv wirken, nicht als Idiot im Hamsterrad. Ich sende meinen Dank an Adolf Hitler und an das deutsche Volk.
Hitler justified the German attack by claiming Polish culpability based on invented Polish atrocities at Pitschen and other places, including Gleiwitz and Hochlinden , [3] both of these being part of the culmination of Operation Himmler , a false flag operation intended to demonstrate that the Poles had attacked first, the Gleiwitz incident being the most noted. This night for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5:45 a.
Hitler then declared himself as the "First soldier of the German Reich" Erster Soldat des Deutschen Reiches , a self-claimed rank, effectively equivalent of Generalissimo. I have once more put on that coat that was the most sacred and dear to me. I will not take it off again until victory is secured, or I will not survive the outcome. William Shirer observed that "Only once that day did Hitler utter the truth. In the end, this once, he would prove as good as his word.
But no German I met in Berlin that day noticed that what the Leader was saying quite bluntly was that he could not face, or take, defeat should it come".
Криппс получил чёткие инструкции любыми средствами втянуть Советскую Россию в проанглийскую коалицию. Английская пресса сообщала об этой миссии, поскольку её никак нельзя было скрыть. Осенью 1939 года и весной 1940 года первые результаты этой миссии Криппса дали себя знать. В то время как Советская Россия предприняла попытку подчинить военной силой не только Финляндию, но и Балтийские страны, она вдруг начала обосновывать свои действия настолько же смехотворными, насколько они были и фальшивыми утверждениями, что, дескать, она должна «защитить эти страны от внешней угрозы». Эта «внешняя угроза» означала только Германию; никакая другая страна не имела доступа в балтийский бассейн и не могла там угрожать.
Но я вынужден был молчать. Но те, кто был у власти в Кремле, немедленно пошли ещё дальше. В то время как весной 1940 года Германия, в соответствии с так называемым «Пактом о Ненападении», отозвала свои войска с восточной границы и на самом деле, большая часть восточной границы была тотально очищена от немецких войск , концентрация российских войск на западной границе уже началась, что уже можно было рассматривать как целенаправленную угрозу Германии. В соответствии с заявлением советского министра иностранных дел, а затем премьер-министра Вячеслава Молотова, персонально сделанным в то время, у Советов было уже весной 1940 года 22 дивизии только в одной Прибалтике. И в то время как само советское правительство всегда утверждало, что войска, дескать, были введены по просьбе местного населения Прибалтики, цель их продолжающегося присутствия была демонстрация своей силы Германии. В то время как наши солдаты с 5 мая 1940 года уничтожали англо-французские силы на западе, концентрация советских войск и их манёвры на нашей восточной границе приобретали всё более и более угрожающие размеры.
Поэтому, в интересах Германии, я с августа 1940 года уже не мог более позволить нашими восточным провинциям, тем более что они к этому времени вообще зачастую были пустыми, оставаться незащищёнными ввиду беспрецедентного нарастания числа большевистских дивизий. Это всё был результат англо-советской кооперации, направленной на создание на востоке такой мощной армейской группировки, чтобы Германское Командование не смогло бы закончить блицкриг на западе полным разгромом, особенно, что касается в части военно-воздушных сил. И всё это было в соответствии не только с английской, но и советской политикой; поскольку и Англия, и Советская Россия имели ввиду затягивать войну как можно дольше, чтобы постепенно ослаблять и ослаблять всю Европу и сделать её совсем неспособной. Анализируя, атака СССР на Румынию была также направлена на овладение важной материальной базой не только Германии, но и всеевропейской экономики и, по меньшей мере, имела ввиду разрушить её. Германия, особенно с 1933 года, с непрерывным терпением искала возможности наладить торговлю со странами юго-восточной Европы. Поэтому мы всегда были заинтересованы во внутреннем спокойствии и внутренней организации этих стран.
Советское нападение на Румынию и связка Греции с Англией грозили в короткое время превратить этот регион в театр войны. Прямо противоположно своим принципам и срочной просьбе румынского правительства, которое само несло ответственность именно за такое развитие событий, я советовал им принятие советских требований ради мира и уступку Бессарабии Молдавии. Румынское правительство, однако, считало, что оно способно отчитаться перед своим народом, только если Германия и Италия в качестве компенсации, по крайне мере, могли бы хоть гарантировать целостность того, что осталось от Румынии. Я согласился на это с тяжёлым сердцем, принципиально, потому что, мы — Германцы, когда даём свои гарантии — мы держим их. Мы не англичане, и не евреи. Я до последней секунды, хотя и облечённый персональными обязательствами, надеялся на сохранении мира в этом регионе.
Для этого, чтобы разрешить эти проблемы и достигнуть ясности в отношениях между Советской Россией и Германией, а также ввиду продолжающейся концентрации советских войск на нашей восточной границе, я пригласил Молотова в Берлин. Советский министр иностранных дел тогда потребовал от Германии разъяснений соглашения по следующим четырём пунктам: 1. Мой ответ: Германская гарантия имеет общий характер и безусловно накладывает на нас обязанности. Советская Россия, однако, никогда не объявляла нам, что имеет и другие интересы в Румынии за пределами Бессарабии. Уже свершившаяся оккупация советскими войсками Северной Буковины уже вышла за пределы советских уверений, поэтому я не думаю, что Россия на данный момент имеет ещё более далеко идущие намерения против Румынии. Второй пункт Молотова: Советская Россия опять чувствует угрозу Финляндии.
Кремль определённо не может терпеть этого. Готова ли Германия не оказывать помощь Финляндии и, более того, немедленно отозвать германские войска уже находящиеся в Киркенесе? Но новая война СССР против маленького финского народа уже не может рассматриваться германским правительством как нормальное явление; равно как мы никогда и не поверим, что Финляндия каким-то образом может угрожать СССР. Ни при каких обстоятельствах мы не желаем нового театра войны на Балтике.
Речь Гитлера на съезде НСДАП 1934
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года, в котором он разъяснил причины нападения Германии на СССР. Речи гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком языке. 1. Германия должна, наконец, согласиться, что так как Россия снова чувствует в свой адрес угрозу со стороны Финляндии, Россия должна иметь возможность ликвидировать Финляндию. On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under.