I have very often in my lifetime been a prophet and have been mostly derided. At the time of my struggle for power it was in the first instance the Jewish people who only greeted with laughter my prophecies that I would someday take over the leadership of the state and of the entire people of. A speech by Adolf Hitler on foreign policy from 1937.
Адольф Гитлер цитаты
Цитаты Гитлера на немецком. Высказывания о любви Адольфа Гитлера. Цитаты про Гитлера. Х.С. Чемберлен: То, что Германия в час величайшей беды порождает для себя некоего Гитлера, доказывает, что она жива; о том же говорят и его действия. Немецкая расовая теория привела Гитлера и его друзей к тому выводу, что немцы как единственно полноценная нация должны господствовать над другими нациями. I have very often in my lifetime been a prophet and have been mostly derided. At the time of my struggle for power it was in the first instance the Jewish people who only greeted with laughter my prophecies that I would someday take over the leadership of the state and of the entire people of. Цитаты и афоризмы Гитлера были представлены выше. Последние записи: Лабиринт английский для детей Учебник по немецкому языку для детей Оператор declare в PHP: объявление констант.
Die Rede Adolf Hitlers – Речь Адольфа Гитлера
| Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года | Воззвание Фюрера к Германскому Народу и Нота Министерства Иностранных Дел Германии Советскому Правительству с приложениями. |
| Фразы на немецком Гитлера - история и значения | SIOBR | VK | Пользователь Микола Довгенький задал вопрос в категории Лингвистика и получил на него 2 ответа. |
| Фразы на немецком Гитлера - история и значения | SIOBR | VK | Немецкий является языком оригинала многих из нижеприведенных цитат, потому что среди немцев было много великих людей. |
| "Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus | September 1, 1939, justifying the German invasion of Poland. Short video clip excerpt. |
Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
They went on around: Every state in the world, they declared, needs a guarantee. Great Britain will put her whole strength behind them and will protect them. Today this same arch-liar says: "But we were really never in a position to carry on the war alone. Therefore they cooked up a coalition against us of world-wide extent. The methods have likewise remained the same. Promises to all those of little faith, the credulous, or stupid, who wanted to trust these promises, moreover, the attempt to allow their own interests to be represented with as much other blood as possible.
This truth is connected with the second British method, that is, with the method of division. In that time that the British Empire had its origin, Germany tore herself apart. There were at that time modes of thought that we no longer understand, modes of thought of a religious kind, that unfortunately were fought out only with the sword, modes of thought that became horrible among the people, that seem insufficient to us in their inner being. Only these grievous internal struggles, that cost the German people endless blood, gave England the opportunity in this same period, to raise up a world claim, that never belonged to her either in number or in significance. Then I must always point out that it is not true that we Germans are like upstarts, but if one wants to talk about upstarts, then it is unconditionally the English and not ourselves!
We have an older history, and in a time when Europe had a powerful German Empire, England was a quite insignificant, small, green island. In the last World War the possibilities of this splitting up lay in another sphere. Afterwards the religious problems did not provoke any more bloodshed, especially since the priests themselves would not have been ready any more to sacrifice their lives for these causes. We lived through it then. The parties of the right and the parties of the left, which further broke up in a dozen bourgeois aspects, in a half dozen proletarian aspects, and ever split up some more, and having begun with these parties, from the bourgeoisie of the bourgeois center up to the KPD Communist Party of Germany , succeeded this refers back to the parties of the right and left in undermining and breaking down the German people slowly from within.
In spite of that, the course of the war was a glorious one. The years 1914-1918-they proved it: in which not even the opponents triumphed. A low, common revolt was plotted by Marxian-demoralizing-Liberal-Capitalistic subjects-behind all of it as a driving force was the eternal Jew. They brought Germany to its collapse at that time. Only the cowardice of the then rulers, their indecision, their halfway measures, their own uncertainty brought it on.
And so the First World War could not alone be lost by the merit of our opponents, but exclusively by our own fault. The consequences of this collapse in November were not that world democracy stretched out open arms to Germany, were not the concern of others to free the German people from its burdens and to lift the German people to a higher standard of culture. For that they could have no concern at all, for they themselves had a much lower one. But the consequence was just their collapse, the most frightful one, politically and economically, that a people has ever experienced. At that time there came to us a man who has done the German people immeasurable harm, Woodrow Wilson, the man who lied with a straight face.
If Germany would lay down her arms, then she would get a compassionate, an understanding peace! Then she would not lose her colonies! But the colonial problems were fixed up, all right! The man lyingly promised us that there would be a general disarmament, that we would then be accepted on equal terms among nations, peoples, etc. He lyingly promised us that then secret diplomacy would be done away with, and that we too would then enter into a new age of peace, of equality, of reason, etc.!
Screams the last sentence. He was his right hand. Our German folk believed this man then. They had no idea that they were dealing here with an American President, that is, with a man who has no regard for truths; who, for example, can calmly say before an election: "I shall vote against war," and after the election can say: "I vote for war. So there came the hour then the German people got its disappointment at the moment when the German subordinate emissaries entered the car in the Compiegne forest, now known to us for the second time.
And there right away came the rude question: "What are you gentlemen doing here? They said: "He who says that the intention is to take from Germany her... They said beforehand: "He who says that we want to take away part of the German people is inciting the people! They had broken all their promises! In a few months the German people sank into a state of unimaginably deep despair and despondency-starving people without hope any longer.
A people that did not get its war-prisoners back, even after the armistice and peace-treaty had been signed! A people that was not given food, even after it was defenseless! A people that was now repeatedly coerced,-if one carefully studies those times-from whom re-subjection was again and again demanded, extorted by some new repression. When one reflects upon this even today, one falls even now into a state of burning hatred and rancor against a world in which anything like this is possible. Well, it was at that time, my racial comrades, when everything was broken up, when the upper leadership had faithlessly fled abroad, when others were surrendering, when the Wehrmacht had to give up its weapons, when the people disarmed themselves voluntarily,-it was at that time, when the agitation?
It was such a mad determination in the eyes of those others, that my closest friends did not understand me. I found the strength for this determination only from my knowledge of the people. If, at that time, I had only known the upper ten thousand, believe me, my German people-I would not stand before you today, I would never have found courage for this thought which is capable of revolutionizing a people. I knew at that time first and all the people itself; I knew... I could not abandon that, for it would have been to betray my own comrades, who were just as badly...
I have come to know the great mass of the German people, ladies and gentlemen, from living with them. And these masses have not only upheld my belief in the people, but have restored it, and constantly strengthened it through all the years since then, in the face of contrary circumstances, or when any misfortune seemed to threaten the realization of my plans. It was clear to me that this whole development, just as in the last 20 years or 30 years before the war, could lead only to collapse. But I had already formed the resolve to declare war on this whole development. That is not merely to declare: "I will get a German Wehrmacht, I will get an army or an air-force"; it was clear to me that the inner structure of the social order must be altered, so that in the dead body of our people the blood would flow again, and that society should hold firmly...
I have always looked upon this undertaking as possible, as within the power of the country. But I was of the conviction that strength could only be given to a body in which the sight and the essence of the new condition was already incorporated. Therefore, I was resolved to build up a small movement, beginning with those people who should already have within themselves that which appeared later as really essential to the whole of society. And this was perhaps not so hard as I thought, inasmuch as I was already on guard against the danger of unworthy place-seekers or selfish persons joining my ranks. For whoever joined this movement in those years from 1919-23 had to be a boundless idealist.
Any other kind of man would only say: "He is an utter fool. The man is mad. And I can say that of all my followers, all of them who at that time and later supported me: they had nothing to win, and everything to lose. And how much have they all lost for my sake. I have now begun this battle, first against stupidity, stupidity and inertia, under the so-called higher strata; I have begun it against the cowardice which spreads caste far and wide, the cowardice which always pretended to be cleverness and came around and said: "We must submit; we must be patient"; or, as Herr Erzberger said, "We must sign everything, we must sign everything they put before us; then they will forgive us; then it will be all right again.
Often we have experienced... And we were not quiet. I then formed the program: "The German language belongs to the German. And I had at that time to fight on further against selfish? The man of the Left said to me: "You are going against my interests" or "You are going against my interests.
My interests are class interests. And these class interests oblige me to slay the other fellow. We have the interests of station, we too have our interests,... Do not come in here! And above the interests which seemed to be found in station or in class, stood sic the interests which lie in the folk, in that community which cannot be torn apart, all this appears today to be so obvious a thing to get all these...
One group did not want to accept this idea,... We want our old filth... Eventually you will even demand of me that I should add one... To me also it is obvious, we want... All that was thus not so simple, slowly to draw one thing after another out of this people, and how many have quite simply run away from it.
It was not, indeed, my national comrades, as if every one who came to me at that time, on that account also remained with me. Many a time I had to bring fifty or sixty somewhere... All the others were gone again. And one had to begin again. I made a calculation at that time.
If I win a hundred over, and have only ten remain to me, and the other ninety always leave me, then gradually they will become a hundred if I win a thousand. If I win ten thousand, they will be a thousand, and gradually the number of those who remain will grow ever larger. And if one had departed for the second or third time, perhaps, then perhaps he will be embarrassed to go the fifth time, and then he too will remain. And thus, with unbelievable patience and with perseverance and persistence I will slowly build up a group that is a majority in the German Reich itself. The others may laugh or mock as much as they wish.
It does not matter. They may go against us. That does not matter; then we will defend ourselves. We will not capitulate. We will not get off the street, we will not give up our places until we...
The feeling of the National Socialist is today obvious to us. However at that time, these were new ideas, new learnings, which were neither understood, nor of course, accepted by many. And another thing was added to this, a cursed tradition, in which every single... It was a fight against traditions, and also, naturally, against the elements of cultural up-bringing. Some said,...
One is studied, taught, hammered in, in God knows how many homework hours, and the other is innate born and will always come to the fore, and will know how to find a following among his natural and necessary talents of leadership. It was a struggle against almost all of the things which we were accustomed to in life. Besides this, there was a fight against certain natural interests. For some, because. I do not know what is more evil, a bodily threat rather than a spiritual suppression which can perhaps break down a person even faster than a physical threat.
There have been heroes who have come forward at that time. And I should like to explain something about that: These heroes have in reality continued the war of 1914-1918. One sees them yet so displayed as if they were soldiers in my eyes and their party, no, that the soldiers have been once, and indeed the best soldiers. They were the best soldiers that have ever been, who would not and could not bear the acquiescence, thus we recognize it today, that a really good National Socialist will also be always the best soldier. And now came the organized opponents also.
They were first of all approximately 46 or 47 parties, who hesitated accordingly to unite together the bicyclists, or the small gardeners, or cottagers, or other people. But there were some 48 parties. An Allied Opposition. And here above all the party secretaries, their functionaries,. For where, after all, was a...
You are fighting here for something that can be of no use to anyone. You will both have to get off your high horse. In the long run you cannot do without each other. And as an example he says, or he makes rejoinders, which... Where, then, do the trade-union secretaries and the syndics get?
And most of all, where then do the dear Jews get, who had, indeed, their interests so much in both camps, who on the one hand directed capital, even, and on the other hand led the anti-capitalists, and often, indeed, as one family with two brothers in both camps. My dear national comrades! When at that time I began this fight, I knew very well that it was a fight against an entire condition of things, and how hard it was only my fellow-fighters can know, who realized that for me the last war had offered clear...
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.
For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in tha art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existance founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race!
One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true.
Армия мне лжет! Все мне лгут, даже СС! Was Sie da sagen, ist ungeheuerlich. Sie ist ohne Ehre! У них нет чести!
Готова ли Германия не оказывать Финляндии никакого содействия и, прежде всего, сейчас же отозвать германские войска, направляющиеся на смену в Киркенес? Мой ответ: Германия, теперь, как и прежде, не имеет политических интересов в Финляндии. Однако германское правительство не может потерпеть новой войны России против маленького финского народа, тем более, что мы никогда не сможем поверить в угрозу Финляндии для Советской России. Мы вообще не желаем, чтобы в Балтийском море вновь возник театр военных действий. В немецком оригинале «угрозу со стороны Финляндии» — «von Finnland bedroht» S. Мой ответ: Болгария — суверенное государство, и я не знал, что подобно тому, как Румыния у Германии, Болгария вообще просила бы гарантии у Советской России. Кроме того, я должен обсудить это с моими союзниками. Согласна ли Германия на это или нет? Мой ответ: Германия в любое время готова дать свое согласие на изменение Статута Монтрё1 в пользу черноморских государств. Германия не согласна на присвоение русскими опорных пунктов в проливах. Здесь я занял единственную позицию, которую я мог занять как ответственный вождь Германии, а также как ответственный представитель европейской культуры и цивилизации. Последствием было усиление советской деятельности, направленной против Германии, и, прежде всего, немедленно начатое внутреннее разлагание2 нового румынского государства и попытка устранения болгарского правительства путем пропаганды. При помощи увлеченных неопытных членов румынского легиона удалось инсценировать в Румынии путч, целью которого было свержение главы государства генерала Анто-неску и создание хаоса в стране, чтобы путем уничтожения законной власти устранить предпосылку для вступления в силу обещанной германской гарантии. В немецком оригинале «Status von Montreux» S. В немецком оригинале «разложение изнутри» — «inneren Aushoehlung» S. Несмотря на это, я все же считал лучшим хранить молчание. Тотчас же после неудачи этого предприятия началась вторичная усиленная концентрация русских войск на германской восточной границе. Бронированные1 и парашютные части перебрасывались во все возрастающем числе непосредственно к германской границе. Германская армия и страна знают, что еще несколько недель тому назад на нашей восточной границе не находилось ни одной танковой или моторизованной дивизии. Однако, если требовалось последнее доказательство, несмотря на все диверсии и маскировку, для подтверждения наличия тем временем создавшейся коалиции между Англией и Советской Россией, то оно было представлено югославским конфликтом В то время, как я старался сделать последнюю попытку умиротворения Балкан и в дружеском сотрудничестве с Дуче пригласил Югославию присоединиться к Пакту трех держав, Англия и Советская Россия в совместной работе организовали путч, который в одну ночь устранил тогдашнее правительство, склонное к взаимопониманию. Теперь может быть сообщено германскому народу, что сербский государственный переворот, направленный против Германии, произошел не только под знаком английской, но главным образом под знаком советской агитации. Так как мы и тут хранили молчание, советское правительство предприняло еще один шаг. Оно не только организовало путч, но несколько дней спустя заключило всем известное дружеское соглашение с подвластными ему новыми "людьми"2 с целью укрепить сербов в их оппозиции против умиротворения Балкан и возбудить их против Германии. В немецком оригинале — «Panzerverbaende» — Panzerbrigade, Panzerdivison S. Здесь и далее по тексту — «танковые соединения, танковые бригады, танковые дивизии». В немецком оригинале «с новыми ставленниками» — «mil den ihr ergebenen neuen Kreatur» S. И это не было платоническим намерением: Москва потребовала мобилизации сербской армии. Так как и теперь я все еще считал лучшим не говорить, власть имущие Кремля сделали еще один шаг вперед: Германское правительство имеет теперь документы, которые доказывают, что с целью окончательно завлечь Сербию в борьбу Россия обещала поставлять через Салоники оружие, самолеты, боеприпасы и прочий военный материал для борьбы против Германии. И это происходило почти в тот самый момент, когда я сам дал совет японскому министру иностранных дел д-ру Мацуоке примириться с Россией в надежде послужить этим делу мира. Только быстрый прорыв наших несравненных дивизий в Скопье, а также занятие Салоник, помешали намерениям этого советско-англо-саксонского комплота. Сербские военные летчики, однако, прилетели в Россию и были сейчас же приняты там как союзники. Только победа держав Оси на Балканах разрушила план впутать Германию этим летом в борьбу на Юго-востоке, длящуюся месяцы, а в это время закончить концентрацию советской армии, усилить ее боеспособность, чтобы потом совместно с Англией и с помощью ожидаемых американских поставок быть в состоянии задушить и раздавить Германию и Италию. Этим самым Москва не только нарушила условия нашего дружеского пакта, но и изменила ему самым жалким образом. И все это происходило в то время, когда власть имущие Кремля до последней минуты официально, как и в случаях Финляндии и Румынии, лицемерно говорили о мире и дружбе и составляли с виду безвредные опровержения. Однако, если до сих пор в силу обстоятельств я был принужден постоянно молчать, то теперь настал момент, когда дальнейшее созерцание являлось бы не только греховным упущением, но и преступлением по отношению к германскому народу и ко всей Европе. Сегодня круглым числом 160 русских дивизий стоят у нашей границы. В течение многих недель происходит постоянное нарушение этой границы не только у нас, но также и на Крайнем Севере и в Румынии. Русским летчикам доставляет удовольствие беспечно не замечать этих границ, чтобы доказать нам этим, что они уже чувствуют себя господами этих областей. В ночь с 17 на 18 июня русский патруль перешел на германскую территорию, и только после продолжительной перестрелки удалось принудить его уйти обратно. Теперь, наконец, настал час, когда становится необходимым выступить против этого комплота еврейско-англо-саксонских подстрекателей к войне и в такой же степени еврейских власть имущих большевистского московского центра.
Фразы гитлера на немецком с переводом. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
My German Fellow Countrymen and Women, My Comrades! At present everybody speaks before the forum which seems to them the most fitting. Some speak before a parliament whose existence, composition and origin (are well known). I believe that I should return again today whence I came. Цитаты Гитлера на немецком. История праздника, Традиции праздника, Тосты и Подарки, Интересные факты. In seiner Ansprache vor dem deutschen Reichstag am 1. September 1939 rechtfertigte Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler den deutschen Angriff auf Polen. Die Rede war nicht nur an die anwesenden Reichstagsabgeordneten gerichtet: Durch Radioübertragung und Übersetzungen wurde Sorge.
Адольф Гитлер цитаты и высказывания.
But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different. The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15. Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people.
Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr.
Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to.
And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself.
The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr.
Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us.
Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people.
And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom.
I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere.
And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces.
Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr.
Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension.
Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe.
We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them. The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities.
And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly.
It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty. And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us.
And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades.
Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also. And so it is difficult to see why they keep them. Moreover, Germany has never demanded colonies for military purposes, but exclusively for economic purposes.
It is obvious that in times of general prosperity the value of certain territories may decrease, but it is just as evident that in times of distress such value increases. Today Germany lives in a time of difficult struggle for foodstuffs and raw materials. Sufficient imports are conceivable only if there be a continued and lasting increase in our exports. Therefore, as a matter of course, our demand for colonies for our densely populated country will be put forward again and again. In concluding my remarks on this subject I should like to note a few points concerning the possible ways which may lead to a general pacification of Europe, which might also be extended outside Europe. They are the most important conditions for lasting and solid economic and political relations between the peoples.
A few weeks ago we saw how an organized band of international war mongers spread a mass of lies which almost succeeded in raising mistrust between two nations and might easily have led to worse consequences than actually followed. I greatly regret that the British Foreign Secretary did not categorically state that there was not one word of truth in those calumnies about Morocco which had been spread by these international war mongers. Thanks to the loyalty of a foreign diplomat and his Government, it was possible to clear up this extraordinary situation immediately. Supposing another case arose in which it turned out impossible to establish the truth so readily, what then would happen? Germany is hoping to have close and friendly relations with Italy. May we succeed in paving the way for such relations with other European countries.
The German Reich will watch over its security and honor with its strong army. On the other hand, convinced that there can be no greater treasure for Europe than peace, it will always be a reasonable supporter of those European ideals of peace and will be always conscious of its responsibilities. This would lead to a decisive lessening of tension between the nations who are forced to live side by side, and whose State frontiers are not identical with the ethnical frontiers. In concluding these remarks I should like to deal with the document which the British Government addressed to the German Government on the occasion of the occupation of the Rhineland. I should like first to state that we believe and are convinced that the British Government at that time did everything to avoid an increase of tension in the European crisis, and that the document in question owes its origin entirely to the desire to make a contribution towards disentangling the situation of those days. Nevertheless, it was not possible for the German Government, for reasons which the Government of Great Britain will appreciate, to reply to those questions.
We preferred to settle some of those questions in the most natural way by the practical building up of our relations with our neighbors. I believe that this statement will be understood by all. Moreover, with all my heart I hope that the intelligence and goodwill of responsible European Governments will succeed, despite all opposition, in preserving peace for Europe. Peace is our dearest treasure. Whatever contributions Germany can make towards preserving it, these she will make. Before concluding my address today I should like to give a short sketch of the tasks that lie ahead of us.
In the carrying out of the Four Years Plan lies our first task. It will call for gigantic efforts but eventually it will turn out a great blessing for our people. Its purpose is to strengthen our national economic system in all its branches.
Wer sind Sie, dass Sie es wagen, sich meinen Befehlen zu widersetzen? Jeder hat mich belogen, sogar die SS! Армия мне лжет! Все мне лгут, даже СС! Was Sie da sagen, ist ungeheuerlich.
Под этим могла подразумеваться только Германия. Ибо никакая другая держава не могла ни вторгнуться, ни вести войну в прибалтийских областях. И все же я должен был молчать. Однако власть имущие в Кремле сейчас же пошли дальше. В то время, как Германия весной 1940 г. Согласно личному заявлению, данному тогда Молотовым, уже весной 1940 г. Так как русское правительство всегда утверждало, что его пригласило само население, цель его присутствия там могла быть истолкована только как демонстрация против Германии. В то время, как наши солдаты, начиная с 10 мая 1940 г. Начиная с августа 1940 г. Однако было достигнуто то, к чему стремилось англосоветское сотрудничество, а именно: ввиду концентрации такого количества германских сил на Востоке, германские власть имущие не сочли возможным предпринять радикальное завершение войны на западе, особенно в отношении воздушной борьбы. Это соответствовало, однако, целям не только английской, но также и советской политики. Потому что Англия, равно как и Советская Россия, намерены продлить эту войну как можно дольше, с целью ослабить Европу и повергнуть ее в еще большее бессилие. Угрожающее выступление России против Румынии должно было также в конечном итоге послужить лишь тому, чтобы захватить в свои руки или же, по крайней мере, уничтожить важную опору не только германской экономической жизни, но и экономической жизни всей Европы. Однако, именно Германия, начиная с 1933 г. Мы были поэтому в высшей степени заинтересованы в их государственной консолидации и порядке. В немецком оригинале «в непосредственной близости с мощным выдвижением большевистских дивизий» «gewaltigen Kraeftaufmarsh bolschewistischer Divisionen» S, 9. В немецком оригинале «сделать их своими торговыми партнёрами» — «als Handelspartner zu gewinnen» S. Вторжение России в Румынию и переход Греции на сторону Англии грозили в короткое время превратить также и эти области в общий театр войны. Вопреки нашим принципам и обычаям, уступая настойчивой просьбе тогдашнего румынского правительства, которое было само виновато в таком развитии событий, я дал ему совет уступить настойчивым советским требованиям и отдать Бессарабию в целях сохранения мира. Однако румынское правительство считало возможным обнаружить это перед своим народом лишь в том случае, если Германия и Италия, в виде возмещения, по крайней мере дадут гарантию, что оставшаяся часть румынского государства более не будет затронута. С тяжелым сердцем я сделал это. Прежде всего, уже потому, что если Германия дает гарантию, то это значит, что она отвечает за нее. Мы не англичане и не евреи. Таким образом, я думал в последний момент сохранить мир в этой области, даже несмотря на принятие на себя тяжелых обязательств. Однако с целью окончательно разрешить эти проблемы и установить ясность в вопросе русского отношения к Германии1, а также под давлением постоянно усиливающейся мобилизации на нашей восточной границе, я пригласил г. Молотова приехать в Берлин. Советский министр иностранных дел потребовал разрешения2 или же согласия Германии по следующим четырем вопросам; 1 Так в документе. В немецком оригинале «русской позиции в отношении Рейха» — «russische Einstellung dem Reiche» S. В немецком оригинале «уяснения» -«Klaerung» S. Мой ответ: Германская гарантия является общей и непременно обязывающей нас. Однако Россия нам никогда не заявляла, что она имеет интересы в Румынии, за исключением Бессарабии. Уже занятие Северной Буковины явилось нарушением этого заверения. Поэтому я не думал, что Россия теперь вдруг может иметь какие-либо дальнейшие намерения против Румынии. Россия решила долее не терпеть этого. Готова ли Германия не оказывать Финляндии никакого содействия и, прежде всего, сейчас же отозвать германские войска, направляющиеся на смену в Киркенес? Мой ответ: Германия, теперь, как и прежде, не имеет политических интересов в Финляндии. Однако германское правительство не может потерпеть новой войны России против маленького финского народа, тем более, что мы никогда не сможем поверить в угрозу Финляндии для Советской России. Мы вообще не желаем, чтобы в Балтийском море вновь возник театр военных действий. В немецком оригинале «угрозу со стороны Финляндии» — «von Finnland bedroht» S. Мой ответ: Болгария — суверенное государство, и я не знал, что подобно тому, как Румыния у Германии, Болгария вообще просила бы гарантии у Советской России.
Это не мои рассуждения. Это рассуждения фюрера Нацистской Германии, Адольфа Гитлера. В его понимании лежала борьба. Борьба не за свободу, а за место "под солнцем". Демократичность и мир - дорога к неизбежной гибели. Только борясь можно придти к тому миру, каким его видел Адольф Гитлер.
Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере
| Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера | September 1, 1939, justifying the German invasion of Poland. Short video clip excerpt. |
| 45 лучших цитат Адольфа Гитлера. Афоризмы, высказывания и мысли Адольфа Гитлера — | Адольф Гитлер (1889-1945) был диктатором Германии с 1933 по 1945 годы и является одним из ключевых персонажей Второй мировой войны. |
| Адольф Гитлер цитаты | Кстати, цитата на немецком не бьется в отрыве от этой фотографии. |
| Адольф Гитлер цитаты (347 цитат) | Цитаты известных личностей | Фразы на немецком. Цитаты, афоризмы на немецком с переводом Фразы на немецком. Афоризмы, цитаты, высказывания знаменитых людей в переводе с немецкого на. |
Цитаты Гитлера на немецком
Sie zwingen die Wirklichkeit zu hassen. Иногда то, что мы знаем, бессильно перед тем, что мы чувствуем. Спасибо прошлому, за то, что научило многому. Мир принадлежит тому, кто ему рад. Смерть не самая страшная вещь, просто она последняя что случиться... Der Tod ist nicht das schrecklichste Ding, der ist aber das Letzte, was passiert... Каждый человек делает выбор в своей жизни. Правильным он будет или нет - покажет время. Jedermann trifft eine Wahl im Leben. Ob sie richtig war, zeigt die Zeit. Я лучше умру на собственных условиях, чем стану жить по их правилам.
Ich sterbe lieber unter meinen Bedingungen, statt mit ihren Regeln zu leben. И никто не узнает, как грустит ночами душа, которая днем смеется. Und niemand wird wissen, wie traurig in der Nacht die Seele ist, die am Tage lacht.
At 8:12 p. Hitler then took the floor... Alle Volks-u. Das Orchester liess einen schneidigen Marsch vernehmen. Before mentioning Christianity, Hitler appeared to have made references to the purported dangers of open borders. The meme said: "We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity.
We bolded it below: English Through the limitless sense of sacrifice that already enthralls millions today, a sense of sacrifice that also reaches beyond the borders of the country. She has already driven a symbol beyond the marked German borders. It is the national color of the coming new generation. The bourgeoisie like it. Parties look beyond the border posts, the new Germany already sees the new form in front of it, which consistently overlooks this junk, a form that will create the prerequisites that are necessary on the outside. For us, Parliament is a fencing ground on which our world view is represented. In particular, we do not believe that Parliament will save Germany, that a German National Assembly could do that, rather that the idea of a leader can one day save Germany! This movement has received an extraordinary degree of freedom of operation, which in the highest sense of the word allows everything to be put aside that could in any way divide the people. We have different faiths in Germany, but we are one: which faith conquers the other, that is not the question, rather whether Christianity stands or falls, that is the question!
Today we see before us the inheritance of the people, touching everything. There is no then into which any piece of his heaven is pointed.
В случае, если тот или иной отрывок немецкого оригинала допускает разночтения при переводе на русский язык, то немецкий вариант отрывка текста приводится в подстрочных примечаниях без перевода. Если перевод был ошибочным — в подстраничных примечаниях приводится точный перевод немецкого текста. Воззвание Фюрера к германскому народу Германский народ! Обремененный тяжкими заботами, принужденный молчать месяцами, я дождался часа, когда, наконец, могу говорить открыто.
Когда 3 сентября 1939 г. Англия объявила войну Германии, снова повторилась попытка англичан уничтожить всякое начало консолидации, а с нею и возрождение Европы путем борьбы против когда-то сильнейшей державы на континенте. Так в свое время — путем многих войн — Англия привела к погибели Испанию. Так вела она свои войны против Голландии. Так — с помощью всей Европы — боролась она позже с Францией. И так в конце столетия начала она политику окружения тогдашней Германии, а в 1914 г.
Только вследствие внутреннего разлада Германия в 1918 г. Последствия были ужасны. После того, как в начале лицемерно говорилось, что борьба велась исключительно против Кайзера и его режима и после того, как германские войска сложили оружие, началось планомерное уничтожение германского государства. В то время, как слова одного французского государственного деятеля, что в Германии существует излишек 20 миллионов людей, который — другими словами — должен был б,ы быть уничтожен посредством голода, болезней или переселений, по-видимому, сбывались буквально, национал-социалистическое движение начало свою работу объединения германского народа, а с этим началось и возрождение Германии. Это новое освобождение нашего народа от нужды, бедствий и унизительного пренебрежения стояло под знаком внутреннего возрождения. В частности, это не представляло собой угрозы для Англии, и ее не затрагивало.
Несмотря на это, сейчас же снова началась новая, преисполненная ненависти, политика окружения, направленная против Германии. Снаружи и внутри создался известный нам комплот евреев и демократов, большевиков и реакционеров, единственной целью которого было воспрепятствовать восстановлению нового германского национального государства и вновь повергнуть Германию в состояние бессилия и бедствия. Наряду с нами ненависть этого интернационального, всемирного заговора была направлена против таких же обездоленных народов, которые были принуждены зарабатывать насущный хлеб в тяжелой борьбе за существование. Прежде всего, у Италии и Японии так же, как и у Германии, оспаривалось, если не совершенно отнималось, право участия в пользовании земными благами. Сплочение этих нации, таким образом, было лишь актом самозащиты против угрожающей им эгоистической всемирной коалиции богатства и силы. Уже в 1936 г.
Черчилль заявил, по словам американского генерала Вуда, [произнесёнными] перед представителями американской палаты депутатов, что Германия снова становится слишком могущественной и поэтому должна быть уничтожена. Летом 1939 г. Англии казалось, что наступил момент, когда можно вновь начать разложение Германии путем всеобъемлющей политики окружения. Система с этой целью созданной кампании лжи состояла в том, чтобы объявлять другие народы находящимися под угрозой, завлекать их в начале обещаниями английских гарантий и поддержки, а затем, как в мировую войну, заставлять их идти против Германии. Таким образом, от мая до августа 1939 г. Англии удалось лансировать утверждение, что Литва, Эстония, Латвия, Финляндия, Бессарабия, а также Украина находятся под прямой угрозой Германии.
Часть государств дала себя провести этим, приняла обещанные гарантии, предложенные попутно с этим утверждением, и таким образом перекинулась на новый фронт окружения, направленный против Германии. При таких обстоятельствах я счел долгом перед своей совестью и перед историей германского народа не только уверить эти страны и их правительства в ложности сделанных Англией заявлений, но, сверх того, успокоить сильнейшую Восточную Державу путем специальных и торжественных заявлений относительно пределов наших интересов. Вы все чувствовали в свое время, что этот шаг был для меня горьким и тяжелым. Германский народ никогда не питал враждебных чувств по отношению к народностям России. Однако свыше двух десятков лет еврейско-большевистская власть в Москве старается разжечь пожар не только в Германии, но и во всей Европе. Не Германия пыталась перенести свое национал-социалистическое мировоззрение в Россию, а еврейско-большевистские власти в Москве беспрестанно пытались навязать свое господство нашему и другим европейским народам и делали это не только в моральном смысле, но, прежде всего, также и в смысле военной мощи.
Однако последствиями деятельности этого режима были лишь хаос, бедствия и голод. В противовес этому, я старался в течение двух десятков лет с минимумом вмешательства и без всякого нарушения нашей продукции1 добиться нового социалистического порядка в Германии, который бы не только устранил безработицу, но также предоставлял прибыль труда в возрастающей мере трудящимся людям. Достижения этой политики создания нового экономического и социального порядка в нашем народе, который, планомерно преодолевая сословные и классовые контрасты, стремится к конечной цели — создать истинную народную общность, являются единственными в мире. Поэтому в августе 1939 г. Я сделал это исключительно в сознании своей ответственности по отношению к германскому народу, но, прежде всего, в надежде на возможность все же в конце достигнуть длительного примирения и уменьшения жертв, которые иначе могли быть от нас потребованы. Наряду с торжественными заверениями Германии в Москве относительно упомянутых областей и стран — за исключением Литвы — как лежащих за пределами германских политических интересов, было достигнуто особое соглашение на случай, если Англии действительно удастся втравить Польшу в войну против Германии.
April 2010, bei Laufzeit 2:23; Deutsches Frauenwerk Hg. Eine Dokumentation. Deutschland soll frei werden, aber nicht durch Sie! Mai 1934 in Berlin, in: Max Domarus Hrsg. Und von jetzt ab wird Bombe mit Bombe vergolten! September 1939, Beginn des Zweiten Weltkriegs, reichstagsprotokolle. Ich bin nichts als ein Trommler und ein Sammler.
Lassen Sie uns zusammen arbeiten! Aufgezeichnet von Heinrich Heim, herausgegeben von Werner Jochmann.
Адольф Гитлер Фразы На Немецком Скачать mp3
Я хотел бы найти все речи Гитлера в оригинале на немецком языке, но чем больше я смотрю, тем меньше нахожу. Конечно, кое-где есть несколько его выступлений, но полного текста его речей на немецком нигде не найти. Цитаты, приведенные ниже, собрал Вернер Мазер, автор самой полной и авторитетной биографии Гитлера. Ja, das deutsche Volk war ja damals eine Demokratie, vor uns, Und es ist ausgeplündert und ausgepresst worden. Nein, was heißt für diese internationalen Hyänen Demokratie oder autoritärer Staat? Das interessiert die gar nicht. Es interessiert sie nur eines: Ist jemand bereit, sich ausplündern. Цитаты гитлера на немецком | Анекдоты, цитаты, статусы, загадки, стихи, фразы. On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under.
Text of Hitler's Speech to Reichstag at Nuremberg
Кстати, цитата на немецком не бьется в отрыве от этой фотографии. Адольф Гитлер — немецкий политик и оратор, основоположник и центральная фигура национал-социализма, основатель тоталитарной диктатуры Третьего рейха, глава Национал-социалистической немецкой рабочей п Смотрите видео онлайн «Адольф Гитлер цитаты и. Полный текст обращения Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года, в котором он разъяснял для немецкого народа причины нападения Германии на СССР: Немецкий народ!
Цитаты гитлера на немецком
Начните свою жизнь - по новому и с чистого листа. Желаю всем удачи и только добра. Показать больше.
Всё это было уничтожено Версальским договором, по которому вооружение либо отдавалась странам-победителям, либо просто уничтожалось. А если бы та Германия сохранила свою армию, а потом бы та армия досталась Гитлеру со-товарищи, которые бы её вывели на самый высший уровень для конца 30-х, то каково было бы с ней воевать? Любителям альтернативной истории: армия Германии без Версальских ограничений Байка о том, что на Гитлера работала вся Европа, в которую некоторые ещё верят наивно, легко разрушается приведением конкретных примеров с цифрами.
Мой ответ: Германия, теперь, как и прежде, не имеет политических интересов в Финляндии. Однако германское правительство не может потерпеть новой войны России против маленького финского народа, тем более, что мы никогда не сможем поверить в угрозу Финляндии для Советской России. Мы вообще не желаем, чтобы в Балтийском море вновь возник театр военных действий. В немецком оригинале «угрозу со стороны Финляндии» — «von Finnland bedroht» S. Мой ответ: Болгария — суверенное государство, и я не знал, что подобно тому, как Румыния у Германии, Болгария вообще просила бы гарантии у Советской России.
Кроме того, я должен обсудить это с моими союзниками. Согласна ли Германия на это или нет? Мой ответ: Германия в любое время готова дать свое согласие на изменение Статута Монтрё1 в пользу черноморских государств. Германия не согласна на присвоение русскими опорных пунктов в проливах. Здесь я занял единственную позицию, которую я мог занять как ответственный вождь Германии, а также как ответственный представитель европейской культуры и цивилизации.
Последствием было усиление советской деятельности, направленной против Германии, и, прежде всего, немедленно начатое внутреннее разлагание2 нового румынского государства и попытка устранения болгарского правительства путем пропаганды. При помощи увлеченных неопытных членов румынского легиона удалось инсценировать в Румынии путч, целью которого было свержение главы государства генерала Анто-неску и создание хаоса в стране, чтобы путем уничтожения законной власти устранить предпосылку для вступления в силу обещанной германской гарантии. В немецком оригинале «Status von Montreux» S. В немецком оригинале «разложение изнутри» — «inneren Aushoehlung» S. Несмотря на это, я все же считал лучшим хранить молчание.
Тотчас же после неудачи этого предприятия началась вторичная усиленная концентрация русских войск на германской восточной границе. Бронированные1 и парашютные части перебрасывались во все возрастающем числе непосредственно к германской границе. Германская армия и страна знают, что еще несколько недель тому назад на нашей восточной границе не находилось ни одной танковой или моторизованной дивизии. Однако, если требовалось последнее доказательство, несмотря на все диверсии и маскировку, для подтверждения наличия тем временем создавшейся коалиции между Англией и Советской Россией, то оно было представлено югославским конфликтом В то время, как я старался сделать последнюю попытку умиротворения Балкан и в дружеском сотрудничестве с Дуче пригласил Югославию присоединиться к Пакту трех держав, Англия и Советская Россия в совместной работе организовали путч, который в одну ночь устранил тогдашнее правительство, склонное к взаимопониманию. Теперь может быть сообщено германскому народу, что сербский государственный переворот, направленный против Германии, произошел не только под знаком английской, но главным образом под знаком советской агитации.
Так как мы и тут хранили молчание, советское правительство предприняло еще один шаг. Оно не только организовало путч, но несколько дней спустя заключило всем известное дружеское соглашение с подвластными ему новыми "людьми"2 с целью укрепить сербов в их оппозиции против умиротворения Балкан и возбудить их против Германии. В немецком оригинале — «Panzerverbaende» — Panzerbrigade, Panzerdivison S. Здесь и далее по тексту — «танковые соединения, танковые бригады, танковые дивизии». В немецком оригинале «с новыми ставленниками» — «mil den ihr ergebenen neuen Kreatur» S.
И это не было платоническим намерением: Москва потребовала мобилизации сербской армии. Так как и теперь я все еще считал лучшим не говорить, власть имущие Кремля сделали еще один шаг вперед: Германское правительство имеет теперь документы, которые доказывают, что с целью окончательно завлечь Сербию в борьбу Россия обещала поставлять через Салоники оружие, самолеты, боеприпасы и прочий военный материал для борьбы против Германии. И это происходило почти в тот самый момент, когда я сам дал совет японскому министру иностранных дел д-ру Мацуоке примириться с Россией в надежде послужить этим делу мира. Только быстрый прорыв наших несравненных дивизий в Скопье, а также занятие Салоник, помешали намерениям этого советско-англо-саксонского комплота. Сербские военные летчики, однако, прилетели в Россию и были сейчас же приняты там как союзники.
Только победа держав Оси на Балканах разрушила план впутать Германию этим летом в борьбу на Юго-востоке, длящуюся месяцы, а в это время закончить концентрацию советской армии, усилить ее боеспособность, чтобы потом совместно с Англией и с помощью ожидаемых американских поставок быть в состоянии задушить и раздавить Германию и Италию. Этим самым Москва не только нарушила условия нашего дружеского пакта, но и изменила ему самым жалким образом. И все это происходило в то время, когда власть имущие Кремля до последней минуты официально, как и в случаях Финляндии и Румынии, лицемерно говорили о мире и дружбе и составляли с виду безвредные опровержения. Однако, если до сих пор в силу обстоятельств я был принужден постоянно молчать, то теперь настал момент, когда дальнейшее созерцание являлось бы не только греховным упущением, но и преступлением по отношению к германскому народу и ко всей Европе. Сегодня круглым числом 160 русских дивизий стоят у нашей границы.
В течение многих недель происходит постоянное нарушение этой границы не только у нас, но также и на Крайнем Севере и в Румынии. Русским летчикам доставляет удовольствие беспечно не замечать этих границ, чтобы доказать нам этим, что они уже чувствуют себя господами этих областей. В ночь с 17 на 18 июня русский патруль перешел на германскую территорию, и только после продолжительной перестрелки удалось принудить его уйти обратно. Теперь, наконец, настал час, когда становится необходимым выступить против этого комплота еврейско-англо-саксонских подстрекателей к войне и в такой же степени еврейских власть имущих большевистского московского центра. В данный момент совершается поход, который по протяжению и объему является величайшим из виданных до сих пор миром.
This axiom is that the only reasonable meaning and purpose of all human thought and conduct cannot be to create or to maintain structures, organizations or functions made by men, but only to preserve and develop the innate character of the people itself; for Providence has given us this character as the groundwork of all our constructive efforts. Through the successful issue of the National Socialist Movement the people as such was placed above any organization, construction or function, as the sole element that is always there and will permanently abide. The meaning and purpose which Providence had in mind when it created the different races cannot be investigated by us, human beings, and no theory about it can be laid down. But the meaning and purpose of human organizations and of all human activities can be measured by asking what value they are for the maintenance of the race or people, which is the one existing element that must abide. The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice etc, all these are only secondary and accidental. They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation. These public institutions are right and useful according to the measure in which their energies are directed towards this task.
If they are incapable of fulfilling it, then their existence is harmful and they must either be reformed or removed and replaced by something better. It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place, and from drawing dogmatic conclusions from the consideration of ways and means, when the final purpose itself is the only valid dogma. All of you, gentlemen and members of the German Reichstag, understand the meaning of what I have just said. But on this occasion I am speaking to the whole German people and therefore I should like to bring forward a few examples which show how important these principles were proved to be when they were put into practice. There are many people for whom this is the only way of explaining why we talk of a Nationalist Socialist Revolution, though no blood was shed and no property wrecked. For a long time our ideas of law and justice had been developing in a way that led to a state of general confusion. This was partly due to the fact that we adopted ideas which were foreign to our national character and also partly because the German mind itself did not have any clear notion of what public justice meant. This confusion was evidenced more strikingly by the lack of inner clarity as to the function of law and justice.
There are two extreme poles which are characteristic of this mental lack: —- 1 The opinion that the law as such is its own justification and hence cannot be made the subject of any critical analysis as to its utility, either in regard to its general principles or its relation to particular problems. According to this notion, the law would remain even though the world should disappear. Between these two extreme poles the idea of defending the larger interests of the community was introduced very timidly and under the cloak of an appeal to reasons of state. In contradistinction to all this, the National Socialist Revolution has laid down a definite and unambiguous principle on which the whole system of legislation, jurisprudence and administration of justice must be founded. It is the task of justice to collaborate in supporting and protecting the people as a whole against those individuals who, because they lack a social conscience, try to shirk the obligations to which all the members of the community are subject, or directly act against the interests of the community itself. In the new German legal system which will be in force from now onwards the nation is placed above persons and property. The principle expressed in that brief statement and everything it implies has led to the greatest reform ever introduced in our German legal structure. The first decisive action taken in accordance with the fundamental principle I have spoken of was the setting up not only of one legislator but also of one executive.
The second measure is not yet ready but will be announced to the nation within a few weeks. In the German penal code, which has been drawn up with this wide general perspective in view, German justice will be placed for the first time on a basis which ensures that for all time to come its duty will be to serve in maintaining the German race. Although the chaos which we found before us in the various branches of public life was very great indeed, the state of dissolution into which German economic life had fallen was still greater. And this was the feature of the German collapse that impressed itself most strikingly on the minds of the broad masses of the people. The conditions that then actually existed have still remained in their memories and in the memory of the German people as a whole. As outstanding examples of this catastrophe we found these two phenomena: — 1 More than six millions of unemployed. The area covered by the German agricultural farms that were on the point of being sold up by forced auction was as large as the whole of Thuringia more than 8. In the natural course of events the falling off in production on the one side and the decrease in purchasing power, on the other, must necessarily bring about the disruption and annihilation of the great mass of the middle class also.
How seriously this side of the German distress was then felt might subsequently be measured by the fact that I had to ask for full owners for the period of four years especially for the purpose of reducing unemployment and putting a stop to the dissolution of the German agricultural population. I may further state that in 1933 the National Socialists did not interfere with any activities which were being carried out by others and which at the same time promised success. The Party was called to take over the government of the country at a moment when the possibilities of redeeming the situation in any other way had been exhausted and particularly when repeated attempts to overcome the economic crisis had failed. After four years from that date I now face the German people and you, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, to give an account of what has been accomplished. On this occasion I do not think you will withhold your sanction from what the National Socialist Government has done and you will agree that I have fulfilled the promises I made four years ago. It was not an easy undertaking. I am not giving away any secrets when I tell you that at that time the so-called economic experts were convinced that the economic crisis could not be overcome. In the face of this staggering situation which, as I have said, appeared hopeless to the minds of the experts, I still believed in the possibility of a German revival and particularly in the possibility of an economic recovery.
My belief was grounded on two considerations: — 1 I have always had sympathy for those excited people who invariably talk of the collapse of the nation whenever they find themselves confronted with a difficult situation. What do they mean by a collapse? The German people were already in existence before they made any definite appearance in history as it is known to us. Now, leaving out entirely what their pre-historic experiences may have been, it is certain that during the past two thousand years of history, through which that portion of mankind which we call the German People has passed, unspeakable miseries and catastrophes must have befallen them more than once. Famines, wars and pestilences have overwhelmed our people and wreaked terrible havoc among them. It must give rise to unlimited faith in the vital resources of a nation when we recall the fact that only a few centuries ago our German people, with a population of more than eighteen millions, were reduced by the Thirty Years War to less than four millions. Let us also remember that this once flourishing land was pillaged, dismembered and devastated, that its cities were burned down, its hamlets and villages laid waste, that its fields were left uncultivated and barren. Some ten years afterwards our people began again to increase in number.
The cities were rebuilt and began to be filled with a new life. The fields were ploughed once more. Songs were heard along the countryside, in concord with the rhythm of that work which brought new life and livelihood to the people. Let us look back over the development, or at least that part of it known to us, through which our people have passed since those dim historic ages down to the present time. We shall then recognize how puny is all the fuss that these weakling fools make who immediately begin to talk about the collapse of the economic structure—and hence of human existence—the first moment a piece of printed paper loses its face value somewhere in the world. Germany and the German people have mastered many a grave catastrophe. Of course, we must admit that the right men were always needed to formulate the necessary measures and enforce them without paying any attention to those negative persons who always think that they know more than others. A bevy of parliamentarian weaklings are certainly not the kind of men to lead a nation out of the slough of distress and despair.
I firmly believed and was solemnly convinced that the economic catastrophe would be mastered in Germany as soon as the people could be got to believe in their own immortality as a people and as soon as they realized that the aim and purpose of all economic effort is to save and maintain the life of the nation. But unfortunately I have observed that the worst theorists are always busy in those quarters where theory has no place at all and where practical life counts for everything. It goes without saying that in the economic sphere and with the passing of time experience has given rise to the employment of certain definite principles and also definite methods of work which have been proved to be productive of good results. But all methods and principles are subject to the time element. To make hard-and-fast dogmas out of practical methods would deprive the human faculties and working power of that elasticity which alone enables them to face changing demands by changing the means of meeting them accordingly and thus mastering them. There were many persons among us who busied themselves, with that perseverance which is characteristic of the Germans, in an effort to formulate dogmas from economic methods and then raise that dogmatic system to a branch of our university curriculum, under the title of national economy. According to the pronouncements issued by these national economists, Germany was irrevocably lost. It is a characteristic of all dogmatists that they vigorously reject any new dogma.
In other words, they criticize any new piece of knowledge that may be put forward and reject it as mere theory. For the last eigtheen [sic] years we have been witnessing a rare spectacle. Our economic dogmatists have been proved wrong in almost every branch of practical life and yet they repudiate those who have actually overcome the economic crisis, as propagators of false theories and damn them accordingly. You all know the story of the doctor who told a patient that he could live only for another six months. Ten years afterwards the patient met the physician; but the only surprise which the latter expressed at the recovery of the patient was to state that the treatment which the second doctor gave the patient was entirely wrong. The German economic policy which National Socialism introduced in 1933 is based on some fundamental considerations. In the relations between economics and the people, the people alone is the only unchangeable element. Economic activity in itself is no dogma and never can be such.
There is no economic theory or opinion which can claim to be considered as sacrosanct. The will to place the economic system at the service of the people, and capital at the service of economics, is the only thing that is of decisive importance here. We know that National Socialism vigorously combats the opinion which holds that the economic structure exists for the benefit of capital and that the people are to be looked upon as subject to the economic system. We were therefore determined from the very beginning to exterminate the false notion that the economic system could exist and operate entirely freely and entirely outside of any control or supervision on the part of the State. Today there can no longer be such a thing as an independent economic system. That is to say, the economic system can no longer be left to itself exclusively. And this is so, not only because it is unallowable from the political point of view but also because, in the purely economic sphere itself, the consequences would be disastrous. It is out of the question that millions of individuals should be allowed to work just as they like and merely to meet their own needs; but it is just as impossible to allow the entire system of economics to function according to the notions held exclusively in economic circles and thus made to serve egotistic interests.
Then there is the further consideration that these economic circles are not in a position to bear the responsibility for their own failures. In its modern phase of the development, the economic system concentrates enormous masses of workers in certain special branches and in definite local areas. New inventions or a slump in the market may destroy whole branches of industry at one blow. The industrialist may close his factory gates. He may even try to find a new field for his personal activities. In most cases he will not be ruined so easily. Moreover, the industrialists who have to suffer in such contingencies are only a small number if individuals. But on the other side there are hundreds of thousands of workers, with their wives and children.
Who is to defend their interests and care for them? The whole community of the people? Indeed, it is its duty to do so. Therefore the whole community cannot be made to bear the burden of economic disasters without according it the right of influencing and controlling economic life and thus avoiding catastrophes. It was exclusively a problem of how industrial lab our could best be employed on the one side and, on the other, how our agricultural resources could be utilized. This is first and foremost a problem of organization. Phrases, such as the freedom of the economic system, for example, are no help. What we have to do is use all available means at hand to make production possible and open up fields of activity for our working energies.
If this can be successfully done by the economic leaders themselves, that is to say by the industrialists, then we are content. But if they fail the folk-community, which in this case means the State, is obliged to step in for the purpose of seeing that the working energies of the nation are employed in such a way that what they produce will be of use to the nation, and the State will have to devise the necessary measures to assure this. In this respect the State may do everything; but one thing it cannot do—-and this was the actual state of affairs we had to face—-is to allow 12. For the folk-community does not exist on the fictitious value of money but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is the first cover for a currency. And if I increase production I increase the real income of my fellow-citizens. And if I reduce production I reduce that income, no matter what wages are paid out. Members of the Reichstag: Within the past four years we have increased German production to an extraordinary degree in all branches.
And the whole German nation benefits by this increase. For it there is a demand today for very many million tons of coal more than formerly, this is not for the purpose of superheating the houses of a few millionaires to a couple of thousand degrees, but rather because millions of our German countrymen are thus enabled to purchase more coal for themselves with their increased income. By giving employment to millions of German workers who had hitherto been idle, the National Socialist Revolution has brought about such a gigantic increase in German production. That rise in our total national income guarantees the market value of the goods produced. And only in such cases where we could not increase this production, owing to certain conditions that were beyond our control, there have been shortages from time to time; but these bear no proportion whatsoever to the general success of the National Socialist struggle. The four-year plan is the most striking manifestation of the systematic way in which our economic life is being conducted. In particular this plan will provide permanent employment in the internal circulation of our economic life for those masses of German lab our that are now being released from the armament industry. One sign of the gigantic economic development which has taken place is that in many industries today it is quite difficult to find sufficient skilled workmen.
I am thankful that this is so; because it will help to place the importance of the worker as a man and as a working force in its proper light; and also because in doing so—though there are other motives also—we have a chance of making the activities of the party and its unions better understood and thus securing stronger and more willing support. Seeing that we insist on the national importance of the function which our economic system fulfils, it naturally follows that the former disunion between employer and employee can no longer exist. But the new State will not and does not wish to assume the role of entrepreneur. It will regulate the working strength of the nation only in so far as such regulation is necessary for the common good. And it will supervise conditions and methods of working only in so far as this is in the interests of all those engaged in work. Under no circumstances will the State attempt to bureaucratize economic life. The economic effects that follow from every real and practical initiative benefit the people as a whole. At the present moment an inventor or an economic organizer is of inestimable value to the folk community.
For the future the first task of National Socialist education will be to make clear to all our fellow-citizens how their reciprocal worth must be appreciated. We must point out to the one side how there can be no substitute for the German worker and we must teach the German worker how indispensable are the inventor and the genuine business leader. It is quite clear that under the aegis of such an outlook on economic life, strikes and lock-outs can no longer be tolerated. The National Socialists State repudiates the right of economic coercion. Above all contracting parties stand the economic interests of the nation, which are the interests of the people. The practical results of this economic policy of ours are already known to you. Throughout the whole nation there is a tremendous urge towards productive activity. Enormous works are arising everywhere for the expansion of industry and traffic.
While in other countries strikes or lock-outs shatter the stability of national production, our millions of productive workers obey the highest of all laws that we have in this world, namely the law of common sense. Within these four years which have passed we have succeeded in bringing about the economic redemption of our people; but we realize at the same time that the results of this economic work in town and city must be safeguarded. The first danger that threatens us here is in the sphere of cultural creativeness. And that danger comes from those who are themselves active in that sphere. For our fellow-countrymen who are engaged in artistic and cultural productivity today, or are acting as custodians and trustees of cultural works, have not the necessary intuitive faculties to value and appreciate the ideal products of human genius in this sphere. The National Socialist Movement has laid down the directive lines along which the State must conduct the education of the people. This education does not begin at a certain year and end at another. The development of the human being makes it necessary to take the child from the control of that small cell of social life which is the family and entrust his further training to the community itself.