по предупреждению распространения коронавирусной инфекции». Читать все последние новости на тему: Международная панорама.
Виды перевода
- ноу yонинз транскрипция – 9 результатов перевода
- warning notice - Перевод на Русский - примеры
- 13 лучших переводчиков для браузера - База Знаний Timeweb Community
- Определение
- Навигация мобильным онлайн-приложением Translate
- Сообщить об опечатке
ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ
Если этого не произойдет, ФАС может возбудить дело о нарушении антимонопольного законодательства. В Ozon заявили, что взгляд антимонопольной службы необходим для сохранения прозрачных правил в отрасли. Компания пообещала изучить все требования ФАС и продолжать сотрудничество с ведомством.
У меня назначен визит к врачу. Сегодня никаких предупреждений. Это распоряжение. Скопировать In turn, World Trade Towers 1, 2 and 7 collapsed due to structural failure through fire in a "pancake" fashion, while the plane that hit the Pentagon vaporized upon impact, as did the plane that crashed in Shanksville. The 911 Commission found that there were no warnings for this act of terrorism, while multiple government "no warnings" Так экономические убийцы вернулись в 90-е без успеха.
Если бы им удалось, то он бы до сих пор управлял страной. Мы продавали бы ему любые истребители и всё, что он захочет. Но им не удалось, у них не получилось. Шакалы вновь не смогли его одолеть.
Грозное предупреждение. Предупреждение об опасности. Извещение, предупреждающее о чём н.
The evidence must have been the product of interrogation. In Rhode Island v. Innis , the Supreme Court defined interrogation as express questioning and "any words or actions on the part of the police other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect". Thus, a practice that the police "should know is reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from a suspect... For example, confronting the suspect with incriminating evidence may be sufficiently evocative to amount to interrogation because the police are implicitly communicating a question: "How do you explain this? Under this definition, routine statements made during the administration of sobriety tests would not implicate Miranda. For example, a police officer arrests a person for impaired driving and takes him to the police station to administer an intoxilyzer test. While at the station the officer also asks the defendant to perform certain psycho-physical tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand or finger to nose test. It is standard practice to instruct the arrestee on how to perform the test and to demonstrate the test. The police will not tell the person that they have the right to refuse to perform the test, and the refusal cannot be used in evidence against them, nor can they be in any way punished for refusing to perform it, same as the police will not tell someone that they may refuse to perform a roadside sobriety test without penalty. Similarly, incriminating statements made in response to requests for consent to search a vehicle or other property are not considered to be the product of interrogation. The interrogation must have been conducted by state-agents. On the other hand, where a private citizen obtains a statement there is no state action regardless of the custodial circumstances surrounding the statement. A confession obtained through the interrogation by an undercover police officer or a paid informant does not violate Miranda because there is no coercion, no police dominated atmosphere if the suspect does not know that they are being questioned by the police. Private security guards and "private" police present special problems. They are generally not regarded as state-agents. The evidence must be offered by the state during a criminal prosecution. Under the exclusionary rule, a Miranda-defective statement cannot be used by the prosecution as substantive evidence of guilt. However, the Fifth Amendment exclusionary rule applies only to criminal proceedings. In determining whether a particular proceeding is criminal, the courts look at the punitive nature of the sanctions that could be imposed. Labels are irrelevant. The question is whether the consequences of an outcome adverse to the defendant could be characterized as punishment. Clearly a criminal trial is a criminal proceeding since if convicted the defendant could be fined or imprisoned. However, the possibility of loss of liberty does not make the proceeding criminal in nature. For example, commitment proceedings are not criminal proceedings even though they can result in long confinement because the confinement is considered rehabilitative in nature and not punishment. Similarly, Miranda does not apply directly to probation revocation proceedings because the evidence is not being used as a basis for imposing additional punishment. Application of the prerequisites[ edit ] Assuming that the six requirements are present and Miranda applies, the statement will be subject to suppression unless the prosecution can demonstrate: that the suspect was advised of their Miranda rights, and that the suspect voluntarily waived those rights or that the circumstances fit an exception to the Miranda rule. The defendant may also be able to challenge the admissibility of the statement under provisions of state constitutions and state criminal procedure statutes. In the context of the law of confessions the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is defined by the Massiah Doctrine. The suspect must also voluntarily waive their Miranda rights before questioning can proceed. These include questions designed to establish that the suspect expressly waived their rights. Typical waiver questions are "Do you understand each of these rights? These are separate requirements. To satisfy the first requirement the state must show that the suspect generally understood their rights right to remain silent and right to counsel and the consequences of forgoing those rights that anything they said could be used against them in court. To show that the waiver was "voluntary" the state must show that the decision to waive the rights was not the product of police coercion. If police coercion is shown or evident, then the court proceeds to determine the voluntariness of the waiver under the totality of circumstances test focusing on the personal characteristics of the accused and the particulars of the coercive nature of the police conduct. The ultimate issue is whether the coercive police conduct was sufficient to overcome the will of a person under the totality of the circumstances. Courts traditionally focused on two categories of factors in making this determination: 1 the personal characteristics of the suspect and 2 the circumstances attendant to the waiver. However, the Supreme Court significantly altered the voluntariness standard in the case of Colorado v. After Connelly, the traditional totality of circumstances analysis is not even reached unless the defendant can first show such coercion by the police. Essentially this means the prosecution must prove that the suspect had a basic understanding of their rights and an appreciation of the consequences of forgoing those rights. The focus of the analysis is directly on the personal characteristics of the suspect. A waiver must also be clear and unequivocal. The requirement that a waiver be unequivocal must be distinguished from situations in which the suspect made an equivocal assertion of their Miranda rights after the interrogation began. Requesting an attorney prior to arrest is of no consequence because Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations. The police may simply ignore the request and continue with the questioning; however, the suspect is also free to leave. The most important factors are the length of time between termination of the original interrogation and the commencement of the second, and issuing a new set of Miranda warnings before resumption of interrogation. The consequences of assertion of the right to counsel are stricter. Thompkins 2010 , the Supreme Court declared in a 5—4 decision that criminal defendants who have been read their Miranda rights and who have indicated they understand them and have not already waived them , must explicitly state during or before an interrogation begins that they wish to be silent and not speak to police for that protection against self-incrimination to apply. If they speak to police about the incident before invoking the Miranda right to remain silent, or afterwards at any point during the interrogation or detention, the words they speak may be used against them if they have not stated they do not want to speak to police. Those who oppose the ruling contend that the requirement that the defendant must speak to indicate his intention to remain silent further erodes the ability of the defendant to stay completely silent about the case. This opposition must be put in context with the second option offered by the majority opinion, which allowed that the defendant had the option of remaining silent, saying: "Had he wanted to remain silent, he could have said nothing in response or unambiguously invoked his Miranda rights, ending the interrogation.
Слово «предупреждение» на иностранных языках
Перевод «Предупреждение» с русского на английский язык. Google's service, offered free of charge, instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages. Перевод с русского языка слова предупреждение.
Need more help?
- Онлайн-переводчик – Tetran Translation Company
- Пресс-Центр » Новости
- Google Переводчик
- Предупреждение - перевод на английский, примеры, транскрипция.
- Значение слова "предупреждение" в словаре русский языка
- Слово «предупреждение» на иностранных языках
Слово «предупреждение» на иностранных языках
содержимое warning - предупреждение content warning - предупреждение о неприемлемом содержимом violence. по предупреждению распространения коронавирусной инфекции». Поддержка инструмент перевода: Клингонский (pIqaD), Определить язык, азербайджанский, албанский, амхарский, английский, арабский, армянский, африкаанс, баскский, белорусский. Ахмед спас Джона от смерти, и теперь тот должен вернуть долг. Гай Ричи как никогда серьезен — и как всегда крут. Смотрите онлайн фильм Переводчик на Кинопоиске. Посмотреть перевод, определение, значение, примеры к «Предупреждение» на английском языке, узнать синонимы, антонимы, а также прослушать произношение к «Предупреждение». служить средством предупреждения преступления — to act as a deterrent of a crime.
Виды перевода
- Переводы пользователей
- Text translation
- Сообщество «Яндекс Переводчик» ВКонтакте — публичная страница, Москва
- Содержание
Яндекс Переводчик
Перевод «Предупреждение» с русского на английский язык. служить средством предупреждения преступления — to act as a deterrent of a crime. переводом. Опция поможет не просто потренировать аудирование, но и оставаться в тренде самых горячих зарубежных новостей, которые не сразу переводятся на русский.
Бесплатный многоязычный онлайн-словарь
Уверен, ты не хочешь, чтобы я рассказал о том, как я раньше времени кончил тебе на живот, размазав по нему сперму, и тебя чуть не стошнило, и как ты говорила, что у меня большой. Поди возьми полотенце, ты не сможешь это переварить. Или, возможно, сможешь. Но разоблачая себя, я разоблачаю тебя, и попробуй сказать, что этого не было.
Я уже заранее подстригся, так что я готов к судебному иску. Я планировал остановиться на 16 строчке. Это была 32.
А вот и 34. А мы даже не прошли треть пути. Черт, Слим, Марайя просто игралась с тобой.
Мэрайя - кто? Как будто я игнорировал тебя всё это время без причины. Девочка, похоже, ты окончательно пропила свой разум.
Заблаговременное предупреждение об обязанности уступить дорогу. I gave you plenty of warning, Talby! Я много предупреждал тебя, Талби! Давайте сначала честно предупредим их. Что ж, я честно предупреждаю вас. Soon after , Alice receives yet another warning. Вскоре после этого Алиса получает еще одно предупреждение. You ignored my warning and violated regulations. Вы проигнорировали мое предупреждение и нарушили правила. No attention was paid to his warning.
Никто не обратил внимания на его предупреждение.
Эта машина слишком быстро едет! Watch out! Это выражение аналогично look out и используется в тех же самых ситуациях, когда необходимо обратить чье-то внимание на возможную опасность: Watch out! It is dark in the room. В комнате темно. Here comes a bike. Там едет велосипед. Heads up!
Это выражение носит неформальный оттенок, хотя по значению совпадает с вышеупомянутыми: Heads up! There is a car! Едет машина! Не наступай на стекло. Keep away from...! Не подходи к...! Эта фраза информирует о том, что не стоит приближаться к определённому опасному месту или предмету, так как человек может пораниться или пострадать: Keep away from the fire! A spark might fire your clothes. Искра может поджечь твою одежду.
Keep away from the edge of the rock. It is dangerous to stand there! Там опасно стоять. Take care! Береги себя!
Как Вам уже известно, HowToSay создан волонтерами, и мы стараемся перевести как можно больше слов и фраз. Наша цель - интенсивное развитие сервиса и постоянное повышение качества предлагаемых переводов.
Мы будем признательны любой помощи с Вашей стороны, вот несколько вариантов: Совершить пожертвование через Paypal.